Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reverse domain hijacking
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Implications == Neither the UDRP nor the ACPA provides much deterrent to curb trademark ownersโ abuse of their rights.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Lewis|first1=Brett|title=Reverse Domain Hijacking: Extreme Makeover|url=http://www.dnjournal.com/legal/extreme-makeover.htm|publisher=DNJournal|accessdate=22 October 2014}}</ref> To abate reverse domain name hijacking practices, some legal professionals believe Congress should enact laws that are specifically designed to facilitate litigation against reverse cybersquatters.<ref>Chik, supra note 2 at 60.</ref> Similarly, some advocates argue for stronger penalties to deter the unlawful deprivation of validly registered domain names,<ref>Id.</ref> such as fines and precluding offending trademark owners from filing cybersquatting claims for a designated period of time.<ref>Id.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)