Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Roderic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Usurpation=== According to the ''[[Chronicle of 754]]'', Roderic "tumultuously [''tumultuose''] invaded the kingdom [''regnum''] with the encouragement of [or at the exhortation of] the senate [''senatus'']."<ref name=thompson249>Thompson, 249.</ref><ref name=collins113>Collins, ''Visigothic'', 113.</ref> Historians have long debated the exact meaning of these words. What is generally recognised is that it was not a typical palace coup as had occurred on previous occasions, but rather a violent invasion of the palace which sharply divided the kingdom. It is probable that the "invasion" was not from outside the kingdom; because the word ''regnum'' can refer to the office of the king, it is likely that Roderic merely usurped the throne.<ref name=collins113/> Nonetheless, it is possible that Roderic was a regional commander (''[[dux]]'' of [[Baetica]] in later, legendary sources) or even an exile when he staged his coup.<ref name=collins132/><ref name=collins133/> The "tumult" which surrounded this usurpation was probably violent, though whether or not it involved the deposition or assassination of the legitimate king, [[Wittiza]], or was a consequence of his recent natural death has divided scholars.<ref>Collins, ''Visigothic'', believes that Wittiza was the target of the coup.</ref> Some scholars believe that the king [[Agila II|Achila]], who ruled in opposition to Roderic, was in fact Wittiza's son and successor and that Roderic had tried to usurp the throne from him.<ref>[[Bernard Bachrach|Bachrach]], 32.</ref> The [[senate]] with which Roderic accomplished his coup was probably composed of the "leading aristocrats and perhaps also some of the bishops."<ref name=collins113/> The participation of churchmen in the revolt is disputed, some arguing that the support of the bishops would not have led to the act being labelled a usurpation.<ref>Thompson, 249, who considers the senate comprise merely the palatine officials.</ref> The body of leading temporal and ecclesiastical lords had been the dominant body in determining the Visigothic succession since the reign of [[Reccared I]].<ref name=collins132>Collins, ''Visigothic'', 132.</ref> The palatine officials, however, had not been much affected by royal measures to decrease their influence in the final decades of the kingdom, as their effecting of a coup in 711 indicates.<ref name=thompson249/> [[File:Roderic coin Egitania 1.PNG|thumb|A coin minted in Roderic's name at [[Egitania]]]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)