Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sea monk
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 16th-century natural history === [[File:Japetus Steenstrup sea monks-1-.png|thumb|upright=1.5|400px|[[Japetus Steenstrup|Steenstrup's]] comparison of a [[squid]] with sea monks from the sixteenth century:<br/> (''left'') Rondelet's sea monk; (''center'') ''Loligo'' squid; (''right'') Belon's sea monk.{{Efn|These are approximate facsimiles of Rondelet and Belon, and not exact copies.}}{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=41}}]] The capture of the sea monk is dated to either 1546 or 1549 in 16th-century literature, or to both dates, in the case of [[Lycosthenes]] (1557), who states both captures occurred near Copenhagen, Denmark.{{Refn|Actually three of them, in 1530, 1546, and 1549, but the first of these was found on the Rhine, and "not a sea monk at all" (Paxton & Holland).}}{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=40}} There is also a German woodcut by Stefan Hamer possibly dating to 1546, illustrating the sea-monk caught in Copenhagen in 1546.<ref>{{harvp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=40}} and p. 41, fig g.</ref> The sea monk was listed in several illustrated natural history books published in the mid-16th century, such as [[Pierre Belon]] (1553), [[Guillaume Rondelet]] (1554), and [[Conrad Gesner]] (1558).{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=39}} It was described as a "fish" that looked superficially like a [[monk]]. Belon (1553) gave a briefer notice on ''piscis monachus'' (monk-fish) in his Latin volume, a more expanded account appearing later in his French version of 1555.{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|pp=39–40}} Rondelet (1554) called it "the fish with the habit of a monk (''piscis monachi habitu''),{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=39}} and classed it as a merman (''homo maris'').{{sfnp|Gudger|1934|pp=513–514}} But he did not think the pictorial representations he obtained could be taken at face value, and suspected they were embellished "by the painter to make the thing seem more marvelous".{{sfnp|Gudger|1934|pp=513–514}} What prompted his suspicions of [[artistic license]] seems to be his discovery of other portrayals of the monkfish, quite different from his own, obtained by his rival and friend Gesner and others in Rome.<ref name=nature/> Rondelet stated that a drawing of it from life (or corpse) was made by an artist in the presence of a certain gentleman, who gave a copy to Charles V, and another copy to [[Margaret of Valois|Marguerite, Queen of Navarre]], the latter of which was provided to Rondelet.{{sfnp|Gudger|1934|pp=512–513}}{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=42}}{{sfnp|Barthe|2017|pp=389–390}} The picture being the gift of Marguerite, a great patron of the sciences, meant it was not something to be readily dismissed, but rather authenticated, by Marguerite, treated as an authority on par with Pliny.{{sfnp|Barthe|2017|pp=390–392}} Rondelet's information was imperfect in other ways: he stated the creature had been taken in "Norway [sic.] at Diezum near the town called Denelopoch", but this was a garbling of ''Die Sund'' ("the Sound" of [[Øresund]]) off of Ellenbogen ([[Malmö]], Sweden). The information was conveyed through some intermediary German source.{{Refn|Belon also stated the location as "Diezunt" near "Den Elopoch".}}{{sfnp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=42}} Belon (1555) in his French edition about the monk-fish also classed the monk-fish as a merman ({{langx|fr|homme marin}}), and garnished his commentary with mention of merfolk from ancient writings, specifically [[Siren (mythology)|sirens]], [[Triton (mythology)|triton]]s, [[naiad]]s, and [[nereids]].{{sfnp|Gudger|1934|p=512}}<ref>Belon (1555) {{URL|1=https://books.google.com/books?id=nTReAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP76 |2=''La nature et diversite des poissons''}}, pp. 32–33.</ref> Belon, according to [[Japetus Steenstrup|Steenstrup]]'s assessment, had faith in the existence of this sea monk without ever having seen one.<ref>{{harvp|Roeleveld|Knudsen|1980|p=315}}: "Belon himself had probably not seen mermen but did not doubt their existence"; {{harvp|Steenstrup|1855|p=74}}: "Belon havde ikke self seet Havmænd, men betvivlede dog ikke deres Tilværelse".</ref> Belon attributed these curiosities to "playfulness of Nature".{{sfnp|Pinon|2005|p=254}} The fourth volume of [[Conrad Gesner]]'s famous ''[[Historiae animalium (Gesner)|Historia Animalium]]'' described it,<ref>[[Conrad Gesner|Gesner, Conrad]] (1558) ''Historiae animalium'' [https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN472755935 Liber IIII], pp. 519–522, 645, 216; (1604 ed.) [https://books.google.com/books?id=AA0NvxYDpDQC&pg=PA440 pp. 438–441], 546–547.</ref> and although much of Gesner's piece was derivative or even copied wholesale from his predecessors, Belon and Rondelet, he appended a ''collolarium'' section containing his own findings and observations. As to the creature that measured 4 cubits, Gesner added that it had a black face like an [[Ethiopian]], according to a German rhyme.{{sfnp|Pinon|2005|p=254}}<ref>{{harvp|Roeleveld|Knudsen|1980|pp=316, 323}}: "blackamoor"; {{harvp|Steenstrup|1855|pp=76, 86}}: "som Morian", "Morianfarve".</ref> Gesner here quoted [[Albertus Magnus]]'s account of the ''monachus maris''.{{sfnp|Pinon|2005|p=256}} He also mentioned a similar monster found in the [[Firth of Forth]], citing Scottish historian Hector Boethius ([[Hector Boece]]).<ref>{{cite book|last=Bath |first=Michael |author-link=Michael Bath |title=Emblems for a Queen: The Needlework of Mary Queen of Scots |publisher=Archetype Publications |year=2008|url={{GBurl|id=nUDrAAAAMAAJ}} |page=73|isbn=978-1-904982-36-4}}</ref> Gesner had two other sources to draw from, namely [[Georg Fabricius]] and Hector Mythobius.<ref>{{harvp|Roeleveld|Knudsen|1980|pp=317}}; {{harvp|Steenstrup|1855|p=77}}</ref> The aforementioned Lycosthenes in ''Prodigiorum ac Ostentorum Chronicon'' [Of Portents and Shown Times] (1557) described the 1546 sea monk as having a black head, and gave an illustration of it as such.<ref>{{harvp|Paxton|Holland|2005|p=40}} and p. 41, fig i.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)