Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sejanus His Fall
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Allegations of treason== In the winter of 1618β19 Jonson told his friend [[William Drummond of Hawthornden|William Drummond]] that the [[Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northampton|Earl of Northampton]] was his "mortal enemy" because Jonson had beaten one of the Earl's servants, and that Northampton had had Jonson called before the [[Privy Council of the United Kingdom|Privy Council]] on an accusation of "Popery and treason", based on ''Sejanus''.<ref>Chambers, Vol. 3, p. 367.</ref> What led to these accusations is unknown. It might have been something in the text or the performance of the play. Nor is it known exactly when this accusation was made, though it is likely to have been in the early period of James I's reign. However, according to Jonson expert James Loxley, "no action was taken, as far as we know".<ref>James Loxley, ''Complete Critical Guide to Ben Jonson'', Routledge, New York, 2001, p. 25.</ref> There have been several theories about what may have led to the accusation. One theory is that the fall of Sejanus was thought to mirror that of the [[Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex|Earl of Essex]], who had been executed in 1601. Another writer, [[Samuel Daniel]] was brought before the Privy Council in 1604 because his play ''[[Philotas]]'' was thought "to be a reflection of the dangerous matter of the dead Earl of Essex".<ref>Ian Grant Donaldson, ''Jonson's Magic Houses:Essays in Interpretation'', Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997, p. 37.</ref> However Philip Ayres has argued that ''Sejanus'' was thought to parallel the 1603 trial of [[Walter Raleigh]], who had been found guilty of conspiring with Spanish Catholics to murder James I in the [[Main Plot]]. This might explain how a play set in ancient Rome was suspected of promoting "Popery".<ref>Philip Ayres, "Jonson, Northampton, and the Treason in Sejanus", Modern Philology, 80 (1983), 356β63</ref> It has also been suggested that the central theme of the play, the dangers of rule by royal favourites, was the problem. In the early years of his reign, 1603β1605, James was especially sensitive to criticism of his supporters, given the several conspiracies against him, culminating in the 1605 [[Gunpowder Plot]].<ref>Evelyn May Albright, ''Dramatic Publication in England, 1580β1640: A Study of Conditions Affecting Content and Form of Drama'', Modern Language Association of America: New York, 1927, p. 146.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)