Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Serial-position effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Dual-store models=== These models postulate that study items listed last are retrieved from a highly accessible short-term buffer, i.e. the [[Short-term memory|short-term store]] (STS) in human [[memory]]. This allows items that are recently studied to have an advantage over those that were studied earlier, as earlier study items have to be retrieved with greater effort from oneβs [[Long-term memory|long-term memory store]] (LTS). An important prediction of such models is that the presentation of a distraction, for example solving [[Arithmetic|arithmetic problems]] for 10β30 seconds, during the retention period (the time between list presentation and test) attenuates the recency effect. Since the STS has limited capacity, the distraction displaces later study list items from the STS so that at test, these items can only be retrieved from the LTS, and have lost their earlier advantage of being more easily retrieved from the short-term buffer. As such, dual-store models successfully account for both the recency effect in immediate recall tasks, and the attenuation of such an effect in the delayed free recall task. A major problem with this model, however, is that it cannot predict the long-term recency effect observed in delayed recall, when a distraction intervenes between each study item during the [[interstimulus interval]] (continuous distractor task).<ref name="Bjork 1974">Bjork & Whitten (1974). ''Recency sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall'', Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173β189.</ref> Since the distraction is still present after the last study item, it should displace the study item from STS such that the recency effect is attenuated. The existence of this long-term recency effect thus raises the possibility that immediate and long-term recency effects share a common mechanism.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Greene | first1 = R. L. | year = 1986 | title = Sources of recency effects in free recall | journal = Psychological Bulletin | volume = 99 | issue = 12| pages = 221β228 | doi=10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.221}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)