Editing Social cognition (section)

==Social schemas==
One theory of social cognition is social schema theory, although it is not the basis of all social cognition studies (for example, see [[attribution theory]]).<ref name="Fiske"/> Social schema theory builds on and uses terminology from [[schema theory]] in cognitive psychology, which describes how ideas or "[[concept]]s" are [[representation (psychology)|represented in the mind]] and how they are [[categorized]]. According to this view, when we see or think of a concept a mental representation or [[schema (psychology)|schema]] is "activated" bringing to mind other information which is linked to the original concept by association. This activation often happens unconsciously. As a result of activating such schemas, judgements are formed which go beyond the information actually available, since many of the associations the schema evokes extend outside the given information. This may influence social cognition and behaviour regardless of whether these judgements are accurate or not. <ref>{{Cite book |last1=Augoustinos |first1=Martha |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oKyHAwAAQBAJ&q=Social+cognition+:+an+integrated+introduction |title=Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction |last2=Walker |first2=Iain |last3=Donaghue |first3=Ngaire |date=2014-02-13 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4462-9725-4 |language=en}}</ref> For example, if an individual is introduced as a teacher, then a "teacher schema" may be activated. Subsequently, we might associate this person with wisdom or authority, or past experiences of teachers that we remember and consider important.

When a schema is more accessible it can be more quickly activated and used in a particular situation. Two cognitive processes that increase accessibility of schemas are [[salience (neuroscience)|salience]] and [[priming (psychology)|priming]]. Salience is the degree to which a particular social object stands out relative to other social objects in a situation. The higher the salience of an object the more likely that schemas for that object will be made accessible. For example, if there is one female in a group of seven males, female gender schemas may be more accessible and influence the group's thinking and [[behavior]] toward the female group member.<ref name="Fiske"/> Priming refers to any experience immediately prior to a situation that causes a schema to be more accessible. For example, watching a scary movie late at night might increase the accessibility of frightening schemas, increasing the likelihood that a person will perceive shadows and background noises as potential threats.

Social cognition researchers are interested in how new information is integrated into pre-established schemas, especially when the information contrasts with the existing schema.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Alpay |first=L.|author2=Verhoef, J. |author3=Teeni, D. |author4=Putter, H. |author5=Toussaint, P. |author6= Zwetsloot-Schonk, J.  |year=2008 |title=Can contextualisation increase understanding during man-machine communication? A theory driven study |journal=The Open Medical Informatics Journal |volume=2 |pages=82–91|doi= 10.2174/1874431100802010082 |doi-access=free|pmid=19415137|pmc=2669642}}</ref> For example, a student may have a pre-established schema that all teachers are assertive and bossy. After encountering a teacher who is timid and shy, a social cognition researcher might be interested in how the student will integrate this new information with his/her existing teacher schema. Pre-established schemas tend to guide attention to new information, as people selectively attend to information that is consistent with the schema and ignore information that is inconsistent. This is referred to as a [[confirmation bias]]. Sometimes inconsistent information is sub-categorized and stored away as a special case, leaving the original schema intact without any alterations. This is referred to as subtyping.

Social cognition researchers are also interested in the [[regulation]] of activated schemas. It is believed that the situational activation of schemas is automatic, meaning that it is outside individual conscious control.<ref>Nummenmaa, L.; Peets, K.; Salmivalli, C. (2008). "Automatic Activation of Adolescents' Peer-Relational Schemas: Evidence from Priming with Facial Identity." ''Child Development'', ''79''(6), 1659.</ref> In many situations however, the schematic information that has been activated may be in conflict with the [[social norms]] of the situation in which case an individual is [[motivate]]d to [[social inhibition|inhibit]] the influence of the schematic information on their thinking and [[social behavior]].{{citation needed|date=May 2017}} Whether a person will successfully regulate the application of the activated schemas is dependent on individual differences in self-regulatory ability and the presence of situational impairments to executive control.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}} High self-regulatory ability and the lack of situational impairments on executive functioning increase the likelihood that individuals will successfully inhibit the influence of automatically activated schemas on their thinking and social behavior.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}} When people stop suppressing the influence of the unwanted thoughts, a rebound effect can occur where the thought becomes hyper-accessible.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Erskine|first1=James A. K.|last2=Ussher|first2=Michael|last3=Cropley|first3=Mark|last4=Elgindi|first4=Abdelaziz|last5=Zaman|first5=Manzir|last6=Corlett|first6=Bethan|date=2011|title=Effect of thought suppression on desire to smoke and tobacco withdrawal symptoms|journal=Psychopharmacology|language=en|volume=219|issue=1|pages=205–211|doi=10.1007/s00213-011-2391-4|pmid=21735073|s2cid=18853593|issn=0033-3158}}</ref>