Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Sumner Redstone
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Legal career=== After completing law school, Redstone moved to [[San Francisco]] to become a clerk with the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]], a job that then paid $43 per week. While employed by the Ninth Circuit, Redstone also taught labor law courses in the evenings at [[University of San Francisco School of Law]].<ref name="early legal">{{harvnb|Hagey|2018|pp=59-60}}</ref> Beginning in 1948, Redstone joined the [[United States Department of Justice Tax Division]] as a staff attorney with the appellate tax division, in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court case ''[[United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.]]'' when the government was actively combating anti-competitive practices among [[Paramount Pictures]] and other major film studios.<ref name="early legal"/> After two years with the Justice Department, Redstone followed his supervisors to private practice in 1950.<ref name="early legal"/> Then in 1951, Redstone became a partner of the firm Ford, Bergson, Adams, Borkland, & Redstone with two of his former Justice Department supervisors Herbert Bergson and Herbert Borkland, along with former Deputy Attorney General [[Peyton Ford]].<ref name="early legal"/> In the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case ''Holland v. United States'', Redstone represented the plaintiffs, a married couple of hotel owners convicted of tax evasion following a sudden rise in their net worth.<ref name="early legal"/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/348/121/|title=Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 (1954)|publisher=Justia|accessdate=October 16, 2023}}</ref> Although the court would uphold their conviction, Redstone's argument that the government had the burden of proof in proving tax evasion in unusual increases in net worth would later become [[Internal Revenue Service]] policy.<ref name="early legal"/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/social-sciences-and-law/business-leaders/sumner-redstone|title=Redstone, Sumner M. 1923β|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of World Biography|accessdate=October 18, 2023}}</reF>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)