Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Tsirelson's bound
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Derivation from physical principles == Significant research has been dedicated to finding a physical principle that explains why quantum correlations go only up to the Tsirelson bound and nothing more. Three such principles have been found: no-advantage for non-local computation,<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Linden | first1=Noah | last2=Popescu | first2=Sandu | last3=Short | first3=Anthony J. | last4=Winter | first4=Andreas |author-link4=Andreas Winter| title=Quantum Nonlocality and Beyond: Limits from Nonlocal Computation | journal=Physical Review Letters| volume=99 | issue=18 | date=2007-10-30 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.99.180502 | pmid=17995388 | page=180502| bibcode=2007PhRvL..99r0502L | arxiv=quant-ph/0610097 }}</ref> [[information causality]]<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Pawłowski | first1=Marcin | last2=Paterek | first2=Tomasz | last3=Kaszlikowski | first3=Dagomir | last4=Scarani | first4=Valerio | last5=Winter | first5=Andreas |author-link5=Andreas Winter| last6=Żukowski | first6=Marek | title=Information causality as a physical principle | journal=Nature | volume=461 | issue=7267 | year=2009 | issn=0028-0836 | doi=10.1038/nature08400 | pmid=19847260 | pages=1101–1104| bibcode=2009Natur.461.1101P | arxiv=0905.2292 | s2cid=4428663 }}</ref> and macroscopic locality.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Navascués | first1=Miguel | last2=Wunderlich | first2=Harald | title=A glance beyond the quantum model | journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | volume=466 | issue=2115 | date=2009-11-11 | issn=1364-5021 | doi=10.1098/rspa.2009.0453 | pages=881–890| doi-access=free | arxiv=0907.0372 }}</ref> That is to say, if one could achieve a CHSH correlation exceeding Tsirelson's bound, all such principles would be violated. Tsirelson's bound also follows if the Bell experiment admits a strongly positive quantal measure.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Craig | first1=David | last2=Dowker | first2=Fay |author-link2=Fay Dowker| last3=Henson | first3=Joe | last4=Major | first4=Seth | last5=Rideout | first5=David | last6=Sorkin | first6=Rafael D. |author-link6=Rafael Sorkin | title=A Bell inequality analog in quantum measure theory | journal=Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical | volume=40 | issue=3 | year=2007 | issn=1751-8113 | doi=10.1088/1751-8113/40/3/010 | pages=501–523 | arxiv=quant-ph/0605008 | bibcode=2007JPhA...40..501C | s2cid=8706909 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)