Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Verb framing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Opposition and its limitations== Although languages can generally be classified as "verb-framed" and "satellite-framed", it is not a mutually-exclusive classification. Languages may use both strategies, as is the case in English with the Latinate verbs such as "enter", "ascend" and "exit". The existence of '''equipollently-framed''' languages has been pointed out in which ''both'' manner and path are expressed in verbs (Slobin 2004), which could be true of [[Chinese languages|Chinese]],<ref>Liang Chen, Jiansheng Guo, 2009, Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language, ''Journal of Pragmatics'' 41 (2009) 1749β1766</ref> for instance. Many[[Indigenous languages of the Americas]], such as the extinct [[Atsugewi language|Atsugewi]], do not select verbs of motion based on path or manner. Instead, verbs of motion are specific to the ''kind'' of object that is moving or being moved.<ref>Zheng, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. Thought before language: How deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures. Cognition, 2002, 85, 145-175.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)