Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Vitali set
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Non-measurability=== [[File:diagonal argument.svg|thumb|A possible enumeration of the positive rational numbers]] A Vitali set is non-measurable. To show this, we assume that <math>V</math> is measurable and we derive a contradiction. Let <math>q_1,q_2,\dots</math> be an enumeration of the rational numbers in <math>[-1,1]</math> (recall that the rational numbers are [[countable]]). From the construction of <math>V</math>, we can show that the translated sets <math>V_k=V+q_k=\{v+q_k : v \in V\}</math>, <math>k=1,2,\dots</math> are pairwise disjoint. (If not, then there exists distinct <math>v,u \in V</math> and <math>k,\ell \in \mathbb{N}</math> such that <math>v+q_k = u + q_{\ell} \implies v-u = q_{\ell}-q_k \in \mathbb{Q}</math>, a contradiction.) Next, note that :<math>[0,1]\subseteq\bigcup_k V_k\subseteq[-1,2].</math> To see the first inclusion, consider any real number <math>r</math> in <math>[0,1]</math> and let <math>v</math> be the representative in <math>V</math> for the equivalence class <math>[r]</math>; then <math>r-v=q_i</math> for some rational number <math>q_i</math> in <math>[-1,1]</math> which implies that <math>r</math> is in <math>V_i</math>. Apply the Lebesgue measure to these inclusions using [[sigma additivity]]: :<math>1 \leq \sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda(V_k) \leq 3.</math> Because the Lebesgue measure is translation invariant, <math>\lambda(V_k) = \lambda(V)</math> and therefore :<math>1 \leq \sum_{k=1}^\infty \lambda(V) \leq 3.</math> But this is impossible. Summing infinitely many copies of the constant <math>\lambda(V)</math> yields either zero or infinity, according to whether the constant is zero or positive. In neither case is the sum in <math>[1,3]</math>. So <math>V</math> cannot have been measurable after all, i.e., the Lebesgue measure <math>\lambda</math> must not define any value for <math>\lambda(V)</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)