Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Well-founded relation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Other properties== If {{math|(''X'', <)}} is a well-founded relation and {{mvar|x}} is an element of {{mvar|X}}, then the descending chains starting at {{mvar|x}} are all finite, but this does not mean that their lengths are necessarily bounded. Consider the following example: Let {{mvar|X}} be the union of the positive integers with a new element Ο that is bigger than any integer. Then {{mvar|X}} is a well-founded set, but there are descending chains starting at Ο of arbitrary great (finite) length; the chain {{math|Ο, ''n'' β 1, ''n'' β 2, ..., 2, 1}} has length {{mvar|n}} for any {{mvar|n}}. The [[Mostowski collapse|Mostowski collapse lemma]] implies that set membership is a universal among the extensional well-founded relations: for any set-like well-founded relation {{mvar|R}} on a class {{mvar|X}} that is extensional, there exists a class {{mvar|C}} such that {{math|(''X'', ''R'')}} is isomorphic to {{math|(''C'', β)}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)