Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Whitney embedding theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Strong embedding theorem === The general outline of the proof is to start with an immersion {{tmath|f:M \to \R^{2m} }} with [[transversality (mathematics)|transverse]] self-intersections. These are known to exist from Whitney's earlier work on '''the weak immersion theorem'''. Transversality of the double points follows from a general-position argument. The idea is to then somehow remove all the self-intersections. If {{mvar|M}} has boundary, one can remove the self-intersections simply by isotoping {{mvar|M}} into itself (the isotopy being in the domain of {{mvar|f}}), to a submanifold of {{mvar|M}} that does not contain the double-points. Thus, we are quickly led to the case where {{mvar|M}} has no boundary. Sometimes it is impossible to remove the double-points via an isotopyβconsider for example the figure-8 immersion of the circle in the plane. In this case, one needs to introduce a local double point. [[File:whitneytrickstep1.svg|thumb|350px|right|Introducing double-point.]] Once one has two opposite double points, one constructs a closed loop connecting the two, giving a closed path in {{tmath|\R^{2m}.}} Since {{tmath|\R^{2m} }} is [[simply connected]], one can assume this path bounds a disc, and provided {{math|2''m'' > 4}} one can further assume (by the '''weak Whitney embedding theorem''') that the disc is embedded in {{tmath|\R^{2m} }} such that it intersects the image of {{mvar|M}} only in its boundary. Whitney then uses the disc to create a [[homotopy|1-parameter family]] of immersions, in effect pushing {{mvar|M}} across the disc, removing the two double points in the process. In the case of the figure-8 immersion with its introduced double-point, the push across move is quite simple (pictured).[[Image:whitneytrickstep2.svg|thumb|450px|right|Cancelling opposite double-points.]] This process of eliminating '''opposite sign''' double-points by pushing the manifold along a disc is called the '''Whitney Trick'''. To introduce a local double point, Whitney created immersions {{tmath|\alpha_m: \R^m \to \R^{2m} }} which are approximately linear outside of the unit ball, but containing a single double point. For {{math|1=''m'' = 1}} such an immersion is given by :<math>\begin{cases} \alpha : \R^1 \to \R^2 \\ \alpha(t)=\left(\frac{1}{1+t^2},\ t - \frac{2t}{1+t^2}\right) \end{cases}</math> Notice that if {{math|Ξ±}} is considered as a map to {{tmath|\R^3}} like so: :<math>\alpha(t) = \left( \frac{1}{1+t^2},\ t - \frac{2t}{1+t^2},0\right)</math> then the double point can be resolved to an embedding: :<math>\beta(t,a) = \left(\frac{1}{(1+t^2)(1+a^2)},\ t - \frac{2t}{(1+t^2)(1+a^2)},\ \frac{ta}{(1+t^2)(1+a^2)}\right).</math> Notice {{math|1=Ξ²(''t'',β0) = Ξ±(''t'')}} and for {{math|''a'' β 0}} then as a function of {{mvar|t}}, {{math|Ξ²(''t'',β''a'')}} is an embedding. For higher dimensions {{mvar|m}}, there are {{math|Ξ±<sub>''m''</sub>}} that can be similarly resolved in {{tmath|\R^{2m+1}.}} For an embedding into {{tmath|\R^5,}} for example, define :<math>\alpha_2(t_1,t_2) = \left(\beta(t_1,t_2),\ t_2\right) = \left(\frac{1}{(1+t_1^2)(1+t_2^2)},\ t_1 - \frac{2t_1}{(1+t_1^2)(1+t_2^2)},\ \frac{t_1t_2}{(1+t_1^2)(1+t_2^2)},\ t_2 \right).</math> This process ultimately leads one to the definition: :<math>\alpha_m(t_1,t_2,\cdots,t_m) = \left(\frac{1}{u},t_1 - \frac{2t_1}{u}, \frac{t_1t_2}{u}, t_2, \frac{t_1t_3}{u}, t_3, \cdots, \frac{t_1t_m}{u}, t_m \right),</math> where :<math>u=(1+t_1^2)(1+t_2^2)\cdots(1+t_m^2).</math> The key properties of {{math|Ξ±<sub>''m''</sub>}} is that it is an embedding except for the double-point {{math|1=Ξ±<sub>''m''</sub>(1,β0,β...β,β0) = Ξ±<sub>''m''</sub>(β1,β0,β...β,β0)}}. Moreover, for {{math|{{!}}(''t''<sub>1</sub>,β...β,β''t<sub>m</sub>''){{!}}}} large, it is approximately the linear embedding {{math|(0,β''t''<sub>1</sub>,β0,β''t''<sub>2</sub>,β...β,β0,β''t<sub>m</sub>'')}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)