Editing Wicked problem (section)

== Background ==
Rittel and Webber coined the term in the context of problems of social policy, an arena in which a purely scientific-engineering approach cannot be applied because of the lack of a clear problem definition and differing perspectives of stakeholders. In their words, {{Blockquote|The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail because of the nature of these problems... Policy problems cannot be definitively described. Moreover, in a pluralistic society there is nothing like the indisputable public good; there is no objective definition of equity; policies that respond to [[social problem]]s cannot be meaningfully correct or false; and it makes no sense to talk about "optimal solutions" to these problems... Even worse, there are no solutions in the sense of definitive answers.<ref name="Rittel and Webber 1973" />}}

Thus wicked problems are also characterised by the following:{{Citation needed|date=October 2017}}

# The solution depends on how the problem is framed and vice versa (i.e., the problem definition depends on the solution)
# [[Stakeholder (corporate)|Stakeholders]] have radically different [[world view]]s and different frames for understanding the problem.
# The constraints that the problem is subject to and the resources needed to solve it change over time.
# The problem is never solved definitively.

Although Rittel and Webber framed the concept in terms of social policy and planning, wicked problems occur in any domain involving stakeholders with differing perspectives.{{sfn|Conklin|2006|p={{page needed|date=December 2020}}}} Recognising this, Rittel and Kunz developed a technique called [[Issue-Based Information System]] (IBIS), which facilitates documentation of the rationale behind a group decision in an objective manner.{{sfn|Kunz|Rittel|1970}}

A recurring theme in research and industry literature is the connection between wicked problems and design.{{sfn|Rittel|1988}}{{sfn|Stolterman|2008}} Design problems are typically wicked because they are often ill-defined (no prescribed way forward), involve stakeholders with different perspectives, and have no "right" or "optimal" solution.<ref>{{cite web |last=Conklin |first=Jeff |title=Wicked Problems & Social Complexity |work=Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems |publisher=[[Wiley (publisher)|Wiley]] |year=2005 |url=http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems.pdf}}</ref> Thus wicked problems cannot be solved by the application of standard (or known) methods; they demand creative solutions.{{sfn|Conklin|Basadur|VanPatter|2007a}}{{sfn|Conklin|Basadur|VanPatter|2007b}}