Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Wiretapping
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Canada=== In Canadian law, police are allowed to wiretap without the authorization from a court when there is the risk for imminent harm, such as [[kidnapping]] or a [[bomb threat]].<ref name="C-55 leg sum">{{Cite web |url=https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/LegislativeSummaries/411C55E |title=Legislative Summary of Bill C-55: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse Act) |last1=Kirkby |first1=Cynthia |last2=Valiquet |first2=Dominique |date=2013-02-26 |website=Legal and Legislative Affairs Division, Parliamentary Information and Research Service |publisher=Library of Parliament |id=41-1-C-55-E}}</ref> They must believe that the interception is immediately necessary to prevent an unlawful act that could cause serious harm to any person or to property. This was introduced by [[Rob Nicholson]] on February 11, 2013, and is also known as Bill C-55.<ref name="C-55 leg sum" /> The Supreme Court gave Parliament twelve months to rewrite a new law. [[Anti-terrorism Act, 2015|Bill C-51]] (also known as the Anti-Terrorism Act) was then released in 2015, which transformed the Canadian Security Intelligence Service from an intelligence-gathering agency to an agency actively engaged in countering national security threats. Legal protection extends to 'private communications' where the participants would not expect unintended persons to learn the content of the communication. A single participant can legally, and covertly record a conversation. Otherwise police normally need a judicial warrant based upon probable grounds to record a conversation they are not a part of. In order to be valid wiretap authorization must state: 1) the offense being investigated by the wiretap, 2) the type of communication, 3) the identity of the people or places targeted, 4) the period of validity (60 days from issue).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.freelegalhelp.ca/evidence.html |title=Rules of Evidence |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170207020150/http://www.freelegalhelp.ca/evidence.html |archive-date=2017-02-07}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)