Editing Wise use movement (section)

====Wise use agenda====
Many wise use groups argue that [[rural]] residents suffer a disproportionate impact from environmental regulations, and that the environmental movement is biased toward the attitudes of [[urban area|urban]] [[elite]]s, ignoring the rural perspective. Opponents observe that the extractive forces behind the wise use movement harm rural residents more and prey on the independence of rural residents - preaching the "right to ride" when behind that is the desire to strip mine and [[clearcutting|clearcut]] using unsustainable methods.{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} Some environmentalists disagree with the Sierra Club's "no-cut forest" policy. Steve Thompson{{Who|date=February 2010}} wrote the goal of the policy should be to "provide greater flexibility to achieve true [[forest restoration]]. A blanket, one-size-fits-all 'zero cut' policy severely restricts the Sierra Club's ability to provide solutions to complex forest mismanagement problems."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.clarkforkchronicle.com/hbt.php?rewrite=20030730/sierra-no-cut-7-30-03.htm|title=旋乐吧spin8.com-www.spin8.com-旋乐吧spin808手机版旋乐吧spin8.com-www.spin8.com-旋乐吧spin808手机版|website=www.clarkforkchronicle.com}}</ref>
<!-- new section including other key figures needed here -->