Editing Workhouse (section)

===Georgian era===
[[File:Framlingham Castle -poor house-6.jpg|thumb|The 'Red House' at [[Framlingham Castle]] in Suffolk was founded as a workhouse in 1664.{{sfnp|Cole|Morrison|2016|p=3}}]]
[[File:Microcosm of London Plate 096 - Workroom at St James Workhouse.jpg|thumb|"The workroom at St James's workhouse", from ''The Microcosm of London'' (1808)]]
The workhouse system evolved in the 17th century, allowing parishes to reduce the cost to ratepayers of providing poor relief. The first authoritative figure for numbers of workhouses comes in the next century from ''The Abstract of Returns made by the Overseers of the Poor'', which was drawn up following a government survey in 1776. It put the number of parish workhouses in England and Wales at more than 1800 (about one parish in seven), with a total capacity of more than 90,000 places.<ref>{{cite web |last=Higginbotham |first=Peter |title=Parish Workhouses |url=http://www.workhouses.org.uk/parishes/ |access-date=16 October 2011}}</ref> This growth in the number of workhouses was prompted by the [[Workhouse Test Act 1723]]; by obliging anyone seeking poor relief to enter a workhouse and undertake a set amount of work, usually for no pay (a system called indoor relief), the Act helped prevent irresponsible claims on a parish's poor rate.{{sfnp|Nixon|2011|p=57|ps=none}}

The growth was also bolstered by the [[Relief of the Poor Act 1782]], proposed by [[Thomas Gilbert (politician)|Thomas Gilbert]]. Gilbert's Act was intended to allow parishes to share the cost of poor relief by joining together to form unions, known as Gilbert Unions, to build and maintain even larger workhouses to accommodate the elderly and infirm.{{sfnp|Nixon|2011|p=63|ps=none}} The able-bodied poor were instead either given outdoor relief or found employment locally.{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|p=47|ps=none}} Relatively few Gilbert Unions were set up,{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|p=28|ps=none}} but the supplementing of inadequate wages under the [[Speenhamland system]] did become established towards the end of the 18th century.{{sfnp|May|1987|p=89|ps=none}} So keen were some [[English Poor Laws|Poor Law]] authorities to cut costs wherever possible that cases were reported of husbands being forced to [[wife selling (English custom)|sell their wives]], to avoid them becoming a financial burden on the parish. In one such case in 1814 the wife and child of Henry Cook, who were living in [[Effingham, Surrey|Effingham]] workhouse, were sold at [[Croydon]] market for one shilling (5p); the parish paid for the cost of the journey and a "wedding dinner".{{sfnp|Gibson|1993|p=51|ps=none}}

By the 1830s most parishes had at least one workhouse,{{sfnp|Fowler|2007|p=18|ps=none}} but many were badly managed. In his 1797 work, ''The State of the Poor'', [[Sir Frederick Eden, 2nd Baronet|Sir Frederick Eden]], wrote:

{{blockquote|The workhouse is an inconvenient building, with small windows, low rooms and dark staircases. It is surrounded by a high wall, that gives it the appearance of a prison, and prevents free circulation of air. There are 8 or 10 beds in each room, chiefly of flocks, and consequently retentive of all scents and very productive of vermin. The passages are in great want of whitewashing. No regular account is kept of births and deaths, but when [[smallpox]], [[measles]] or malignant fevers make their appearance in the house, the mortality is very great.  Of 131 inmates in the house, 60 are children.{{sfnp|Hopkins|1994|pp=163–164|ps=none}}}}

Instead of a workhouse, some sparsely populated parishes placed homeless paupers into rented accommodation, and provided others with relief in their own homes. Those entering a workhouse might join anywhere from a handful to several hundred other inmates; for instance, between 1782 and 1794 [[Liverpool]]'s workhouse accommodated 900–1200 indigent men, women and children. The larger workhouses such as the Gressenhall House of Industry generally served a number of communities, in [[Gressenhall]]'s case 50 parishes.{{sfnp|Hopkins|1994|pp=163–164|ps=none}} Writing in 1854, Poor Law commissioner [[George Nicholls (commissioner)|George Nicholls]] viewed many of them as little more than factories:

{{blockquote|These workhouses were established, and mainly conducted, with a view to deriving profit from the labour of the inmates, and not as being the safest means of affording relief by at the same time testing the reality of their destitution. The workhouse was in truth at that time a kind of manufactory, carried on at the risk and cost of the poor-rate, employing the worst description of the people, and helping to pauperise the best.{{sfnp|Nicholls|1854|p=18|ps=none}}}}