Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Addition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Arithmetic === [[Subtraction]] can be thought of as a kind of addition—that is, the addition of an [[additive inverse]]. Subtraction is itself a sort of inverse to addition, in that adding <math> x </math> and subtracting <math> x </math> are [[inverse function]]s.{{sfnp|Kay|2021|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=aw81EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA44 44]}} Given a set with an addition operation, one cannot always define a corresponding subtraction operation on that set; the set of natural numbers is a simple example. On the other hand, a subtraction operation uniquely determines an addition operation, an additive inverse operation, and an additive identity; for this reason, an additive group can be described as a set that is closed under subtraction.<ref>The set still must be nonempty. {{harvtxt|Dummit|Foote|1999}}, p. 48 discuss this criterion written multiplicatively.</ref> [[Multiplication]] can be thought of as [[Multiplication and repeated addition|repeated addition]]. If a single term {{mvar|x}} appears in a sum <math> n </math> times, then the sum is the product of <math> n </math> and {{mvar|x}}. Nonetheless, this works only for [[natural number]]s.{{sfnp|Musser|Peterson|Burger|2013|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=8jh7DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA101 101]}} By the definition in general, multiplication is the operation between two numbers, called the multiplier and the multiplicand, that are combined into a single number called the product. [[File:Csl.JPG|thumb|A circular slide rule]] In the real and complex numbers, addition and multiplication can be interchanged by the [[exponential function]]:{{sfnp|Rudin|1976|p=178}} <math display="block"> e^{a+b} = e^a e^b. </math> This identity allows multiplication to be carried out by consulting a [[mathematical table|table]] of [[logarithm]]s and computing addition by hand; it also enables multiplication on a [[slide rule]]. The formula is still a good first-order approximation in the broad context of [[Lie group]]s, where it relates multiplication of infinitesimal group elements with addition of vectors in the associated [[Lie algebra]].{{sfnp|Lee|2003|p=526|loc=Proposition 20.9}} There are even more generalizations of multiplication than addition.<ref>{{harvtxt|Linderholm|1971}}, p. 49 observes, "By ''multiplication'', properly speaking, a mathematician may mean practically anything. By ''addition'' he may mean a great variety of things, but not so great a variety as he will mean by 'multiplication'."</ref> In general, multiplication operations always [[distributivity|distribute]] over addition; this requirement is formalized in the definition of a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]. In some contexts, integers, distributivity over addition, and the existence of a multiplicative identity are enough to determine the multiplication operation uniquely. The distributive property also provides information about the addition operation; by expanding the product <math> (1+1)(a+b) </math> in both ways, one concludes that addition is forced to be commutative. For this reason, ring addition is commutative in general.<ref>{{harvtxt|Dummit|Foote|1999}}, p. 224. For this argument to work, one must assume that addition is a group operation and that multiplication has an identity.</ref> [[Division (mathematics)|Division]] is an arithmetic operation remotely related to addition. Since <math> a/b = ab^{-1} </math>, division is right distributive over addition: <math> (a+b)/c = a/c + b/c </math>.<ref>For an example of left and right distributivity, see {{harvtxt|Loday|2002}}, p. 15.</ref> However, division is not left distributive over addition, such as <math> 1/(2+2) </math> is not the same as <math> 1/2 + 1/2 </math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)