Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intuitionistic logic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Modal logic ==== Any formula of the intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC<!-- laking reference to this acronym, i found one usage here https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-intuitionistic/ -->) may be translated into the language of the [[normal modal logic]] [[Kripke semantics#Correspondence and completeness|S4]] as follows: :<math>\begin{align} \bot^* &= \bot \\ A^* &= \Box A && \text{if } A \text{ is prime (a positive literal)} \\ (A \wedge B)^*&= A^* \wedge B^* \\ (A \vee B)^* &= A^* \vee B^* \\ (A \to B)^*&= \Box \left (A^* \to B^* \right ) \\ (\neg A)^*&= \Box(\neg (A^*)) && \neg A := A \to \bot \end{align}</math> and it has been demonstrated that the translated formula is valid in the propositional modal logic S4 if and only if the original formula is valid in IPC.{{sfn|Lévy|2011|pages=4-5}} The above set of formulae are called the [[Modal companion|Gödel–McKinsey–Tarski translation]]. There is also an intuitionistic version of modal logic S4 called Constructive Modal Logic CS4.{{sfn|Alechina|Mendler|De Paiva|Ritter|2003}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)