Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Visitor pattern
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Notes ==== The <code>other-object</code> parameter is superfluous in <code>traverse</code>. The reason is that it is possible to use an anonymous function that calls the desired target method with a lexically captured object: <syntaxhighlight lang=Lisp>(defmethod traverse (function (a auto)) ;; other-object removed (with-slots (elements) a (dolist (e elements) (funcall function e)))) ;; from here too ;; ... ;; alternative way to print-traverse (traverse (lambda (o) (print o *standard-output*)) a) ;; alternative way to do-something with ;; elements of a and integer 42 (traverse (lambda (o) (do-something o 42)) a)</syntaxhighlight> Now, the multiple dispatch occurs in the call issued from the body of the anonymous function, and so <code>traverse</code> is just a mapping function that distributes a function application over the elements of an object. Thus all traces of the Visitor Pattern disappear, except for the mapping function, in which there is no evidence of two objects being involved. All knowledge of there being two objects and a dispatch on their types is in the lambda function.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)