Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
MDMA
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====United States==== In the United States, MDMA is listed in [[Controlled Substances Act#Schedule I controlled substances|Schedule I]] of the [[Controlled Substances Act]].<ref>''Schedules of Controlled Substances; Scheduling of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) Into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act; Remand'', 53 Fed. Reg. 5,156 (DEA 22 February 1988).</ref> In a 2011 federal court hearing, the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] successfully argued that the sentencing guideline for MDMA/ecstasy is based on outdated science, leading to excessive prison sentences.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/court-rejects-harsh-federal-drug-sentencing-guideline-scientifically-unjustified | title = Court Rejects Harsh Federal Drug Sentencing Guideline as Scientifically Unjustified | work = American Civil Liberties Union | date = 15 July 2011 | access-date = 29 August 2012 | archive-date = 14 March 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140314210920/https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/court-rejects-harsh-federal-drug-sentencing-guideline-scientifically-unjustified | url-status = live }}</ref> Other courts have upheld the sentencing guidelines. The [[United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee]] explained its ruling by noting that "an individual federal district court judge simply cannot marshal resources akin to those available to the Commission for tackling the manifold issues involved with determining a proper drug equivalency."<ref name="papers.ssrn.com">{{Cite journal|ssrn=2481227 | vauthors = Hennig AC |title=An Examination of Federal Sentencing Guidelines' Treatment of MDMA ('Ecstasy') |journal=Belmont Law Review |volume=1 |page=267 |year=2014}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)