Editing March First Movement (section)

==== British Empire ====

Papers in [[British Malaya]], while still generally in line with reporting in the U.K., shared information about Japan's violent response. One article of ''[[The Malaya Tribune]]'' argued that Japan would not be able to stop the unrest through violence.<ref name="YNA 2019 12">{{Cite web |last=황 |first=철환 |date=2019-02-23 |script-title=ko:[외신속 3·1 운동] ⑫ '식민굴레' 동남아 언론의 동병상련…"계층넘어 韓人 단결" |url=https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190213120400104 |access-date=2024-05-03 |website=[[Yonhap News Agency]] |language=ko}}</ref> A response to a reader question in the April 2 issue of ''[[The Straits Times]]'' attempted to justify why Korea's sovereignty was not approved for discussion at the Paris Peace Conference.<ref name="YNA 2019 12" /> For [[British India]], a 2019 South Korean examination did not find many newspapers articles about the movement. A Yonhap reporter theorized that this was possibly due to India being a British colony at the time. One article entitled "Korean Unrest" was published in ''[[The Hindu]]'' on March 27, and included synthesized information from ''Reuters'' reports. This and another report on April 16 described the movement as a violent armed rebellion. Later coverage of Korean issues in the paper is reportedly infrequent and brief.<ref name="YNA 2019 12" />