Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Open access
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Journal impact factor === {{See also|Impact factor}} [[Journal impact factor]] (JIF) measures the average number of citations of articles in a journal over a two-year window. It is commonly used as a proxy for journal quality, expected research impact for articles submitted to that journal, and of researcher success.<ref name="Lariviere 2018">{{Cite arXiv |last1=Gargouri |first1=Yassine |last2=Hajjem |first2=Chawki |last3=Lariviere |first3=Vincent |last4=Gingras |first4=Yves |last5=Carr |first5=Les |last6=Brody |first6=Tim |last7=Harnad |first7=Stevan |year=2018 |title=The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects |class=cs.DL |eprint=1801.08992}}</ref><ref name="Curry 2018">{{Cite journal |last=Curry |first=Stephen |year=2018 |title=Let's Move beyond the Rhetoric: It's Time to Change How We Judge Research |journal=Nature |volume=554 |issue=7691 |pages=147 |bibcode=2018Natur.554..147C |doi=10.1038/d41586-018-01642-w |pmid=29420505 |doi-access=free}}</ref> In subscription journals, impact factor correlates with overall citation count, however this correlation is not observed in gold OA journals.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chua |first1=SK |last2=Qureshi |first2=Ahmad M |last3=Krishnan |first3=Vijay |last4=Pai |first4=Dinker R |last5=Kamal |first5=Laila B |last6=Gunasegaran |first6=Sharmilla |last7=Afzal |first7=MZ |last8=Ambawatta |first8=Lahiru |last9=Gan |first9=JY |last10=Kew |first10=PY |last11=Winn |first11=Than |date=2 March 2017 |title=The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article's citations |journal=F1000Research |volume=6 |pages=208 |doi=10.12688/f1000research.10892.1 |issn=2046-1402 |pmc=5464220 |pmid=28649365 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Open access initiatives like [[Plan S]] typically call on a broader adoption and implementation of the [[Leiden Manifesto]]<ref group="note">{{Cite web |title=The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics |url=http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200831011418/http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/ |archive-date=31 August 2020 |access-date=28 August 2019}} 2015.</ref> and the [[San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment]] (DORA) alongside fundamental changes in the scholarly communication system.<ref group="note">{{Cite web |title=Plan S implementation guidelines |url=https://www.coalition-s.org/feedback/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200831011423/https://www.coalition-s.org/feedback-on-the-implementation-guidance-of-plan-s-generates-large-public-response/ |archive-date=31 August 2020 |access-date=28 August 2019}}, February 2019.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)