Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Biostatistics
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Quantitative genetics === The study of [[population genetics]] and [[statistical genetics]] in order to link variation in [[genotype]] with a variation in [[phenotype]]. In other words, it is desirable to discover the genetic basis of a measurable trait, a quantitative trait, that is under polygenic control. A genome region that is responsible for a continuous trait is called a [[quantitative trait locus]] (QTL). The study of QTLs become feasible by using [[molecular marker]]s and measuring traits in populations, but their mapping needs the obtaining of a population from an experimental crossing, like an F2 or [[recombinant inbred strain]]s/lines (RILs). To scan for QTLs regions in a genome, a [[gene map]] based on linkage have to be built. Some of the best-known QTL mapping algorithms are Interval Mapping, Composite Interval Mapping, and Multiple Interval Mapping.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1007/s10709-004-2705-0|pmid=15881678|title=QTL mapping and the genetic basis of adaptation: Recent developments|journal=Genetica|volume=123|issue=1–2|pages=25–37|year=2005|last1=Zeng|first1=Zhao-Bang|s2cid=1094152}}</ref> However, QTL mapping resolution is impaired by the amount of recombination assayed, a problem for species in which it is difficult to obtain large offspring. Furthermore, allele diversity is restricted to individuals originated from contrasting parents, which limit studies of allele diversity when we have a panel of individuals representing a natural population.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1186/1746-4811-9-29|pmid=23876160|pmc=3750305|title=The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: A review|journal=Plant Methods|volume=9|pages=29|year=2013|last1=Korte|first1=Arthur|last2=Farlow|first2=Ashley |issue=1 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2013PlMet...9...29K }}</ref> For this reason, the [[genome-wide association study]] was proposed in order to identify QTLs based on [[linkage disequilibrium]], that is the non-random association between traits and molecular markers. It was leveraged by the development of high-throughput [[SNP genotyping]].<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0089|title=Status and Prospects of Association Mapping in Plants|journal= The Plant Genome|volume=1|pages=5–20|year=2008|last1=Zhu|first1=Chengsong|last2=Gore|first2=Michael|last3=Buckler|first3=Edward S|last4=Yu|first4=Jianming|doi-access=free}}</ref> In [[Animal breeding|animal]] and [[plant breeding]], the use of markers in [[Selective breeding|selection]] aiming for breeding, mainly the molecular ones, collaborated to the development of [[marker-assisted selection]]. While QTL mapping is limited due resolution, GWAS does not have enough power when rare variants of small effect that are also influenced by environment. So, the concept of Genomic Selection (GS) arises in order to use all molecular markers in the selection and allow the prediction of the performance of candidates in this selection. The proposal is to genotype and phenotype a training population, develop a model that can obtain the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) of individuals belonging to a genotype and but not phenotype population, called testing population.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011|pmid=28965742|title=Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives|journal=Trends in Plant Science|volume=22|issue=11|pages=961–975|year=2017|last1=Crossa|first1=José|last2=Pérez-Rodríguez|first2=Paulino|last3=Cuevas|first3=Jaime|last4=Montesinos-López|first4=Osval|last5=Jarquín|first5=Diego|last6=De Los Campos|first6=Gustavo|last7=Burgueño|first7=Juan|last8=González-Camacho|first8=Juan M|last9=Pérez-Elizalde|first9=Sergio|last10=Beyene|first10=Yoseph|last11=Dreisigacker|first11=Susanne|last12=Singh|first12=Ravi|last13=Zhang|first13=Xuecai|last14=Gowda|first14=Manje|last15=Roorkiwal|first15=Manish|last16=Rutkoski|first16=Jessica|last17=Varshney|first17=Rajeev K|bibcode=2017TPS....22..961C |url=http://oar.icrisat.org/10280/1/Genomic%20Selection%20in%20Plant%20Breeding%20Methods%2C%20Models%2C%20and%20Perspectives.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://oar.icrisat.org/10280/1/Genomic%20Selection%20in%20Plant%20Breeding%20Methods%2C%20Models%2C%20and%20Perspectives.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live}}</ref> This kind of study could also include a validation population, thinking in the concept of [[cross-validation (statistics)|cross-validation]], in which the real phenotype results measured in this population are compared with the phenotype results based on the prediction, what used to check the accuracy of the model. As a summary, some points about the application of quantitative genetics are: * This has been used in agriculture to improve crops ([[Plant breeding]]) and [[livestock]] ([[Animal breeding]]). * In biomedical research, this work can assist in finding candidates [[gene]] [[allele]]s that can cause or influence predisposition to diseases in [[human genetics]]
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)