Editing Net neutrality (section)

===Counterweight to server-side non-neutrality===
Those in favor of forms of non-neutral tiered Internet access argue that the Internet is already not a level playing field, and that large companies achieve a performance advantage over smaller competitors by providing more and better-quality servers and buying high-bandwidth services. Should scrapping of net neutrality regulations precipitate a price drop for lower levels of access, or access to only certain protocols, for instance, such would make Internet usage more adaptable to the needs of those individuals and corporations who specifically seek differentiated tiers of service. Network expert<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.itif.org/people/richard-bennett|title=Former ITIF Staff|website=ITIF|access-date=6 March 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150312111551/http://www.itif.org/people/richard-bennett|archive-date=12 March 2015}}</ref> Richard Bennett has written, "A richly funded Web site, which delivers data faster than its competitors to the front porches of the Internet service providers, wants it delivered the rest of the way on an equal basis. This system, which Google calls broadband neutrality, actually preserves a more fundamental inequality."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/08/EDBH11LNQS.DTL|title=Google's political Head-fake|date=9 July 2008|website=SFGate|access-date=14 September 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120309053853/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2008%2F07%2F08%2FEDBH11LNQS.DTL|archive-date=9 March 2012}}</ref>