Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Animal cognition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Cognitive bias=== {{main|Cognitive bias}} [[File:Glass-of-water.jpg|thumb|150px|Is the glass half empty or half full?]] A '''cognitive bias''' refers to a systematic pattern of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment, whereby inferences about other individuals or situations may be drawn in an illogical fashion. Cognitive bias is sometimes illustrated by using answers to the question "[[Is the glass half empty or half full?]]". Choosing "half empty" is supposed to indicate pessimism whereas choosing "half full" indicates optimism. To test this in animals, an individual is trained to anticipate that stimulus A, e.g. a 100 Hz tone, precedes a positive event, e.g. highly desired food is delivered when a lever is pressed by the animal. The same individual is trained to anticipate that stimulus B, e.g. a 900 Hz tone, precedes a negative event, e.g. bland food is delivered when the animal presses a lever. The animal is then tested by being given an intermediate stimulus C, e.g. a 500 Hz tone, and observing whether the animal presses the lever associated with the positive or negative reward. This has been suggested to indicate whether the animal is in a positive or negative mood.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Harding EJ, Paul ES, Mendl M | title = Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state | journal = Nature | volume = 427 | issue = 6972 | pages = 312 | date = January 2004 | pmid = 14737158 | doi = 10.1038/427312a | bibcode = 2004Natur.427..312H | s2cid = 4411418 | doi-access = free}}</ref> In a study that used this approach, rats that were playfully tickled responded differently than rats that were simply handled. The rats that had been tickled were more optimistic than the handled rats.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rygula R, Pluta H, Popik P | title = Laughing rats are optimistic | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 7 | issue = 12 | pages = e51959 | year = 2012 | pmid = 23300582 | pmc = 3530570 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0051959 | bibcode = 2012PLoSO...751959R | doi-access = free}}</ref> The authors suggested that they had demonstrated "...for the first time a link between the directly measured positive affective state and decision making under uncertainty in an animal model". There is some evidence for cognitive bias in a number of species, including rats, dogs, rhesus macaques, sheep, chicks, starlings and honeybees.<ref>{{cite book| vauthors = Haselton MG, Nettle D, Andrews PW | chapter = The evolution of cognitive bias |year=2005| location = Hoboken, NJ, US | publisher = John Wiley & Sons Inc.| veditors = Buss DM | title = The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology |pages=724β746}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)