Editing Daily Mail (section)

===Sensationalism===
''[[The Guardian]]'' said that the ''Daily Mail'' have an "ongoing project to divide all the inanimate objects in the world into ones that either cause or prevent cancer".<ref name="Goldacre-2010" /> It has also been criticised for their extent of coverage of celebrities,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Greenslade|first1=Roy|title=Daily Mail is cruel and childish about the Duchess of Cambridge|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2015/dec/14/daily-mail-is-cruel-and-childish-about-the-duchess-of-cambridge|website=The Guardian|date=14 December 2015|access-date=12 January 2016|archive-date=8 May 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170508043211/https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2015/dec/14/daily-mail-is-cruel-and-childish-about-the-duchess-of-cambridge|url-status=live}}</ref> the children of celebrities,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newstatesman.com/martin-robbins/2012/06/sex-children-and-mail-online|title=Sex, children and Mail Online|date=11 June 2012|work=New Statesman|access-date=17 June 2016|archive-date=25 February 2014|archive-url=https://archive.today/20140225124427/http://www.newstatesman.com/martin-robbins/2012/06/sex-children-and-mail-online|url-status=live}}</ref> property prices,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/apr/21/dailymail-national-newspapers|title=Why are papers like the Daily Mail obsessed with house prices?|date=21 April 2011|work=The Guardian|access-date=11 December 2016|archive-date=8 May 2017|archive-url=https://archive.today/20170508043610/https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/apr/21/dailymail-national-newspapers|url-status=live}}</ref> and the depiction of asylum seekers,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Berry|first1=Mike|last2=Garcia-Blanco|first2=Inaki|last3=Moore|first3=Kerry|title=Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries|url=http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.pdf|publisher=United Nations High Commission for Refugees|date=December 2015|access-date=6 June 2017|archive-date=21 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170621193058/http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> the latter of which was discussed in the Parliament's [[Joint Committee on Human Rights]] in 2007.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/23/pressandpublishing.immigrationasylumandrefugees |title=Daily Mail and Daily Express deny asylum bias |website=[[TheGuardian.com]] |date=23 January 2007 |access-date=17 June 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161009122921/https://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/jan/23/pressandpublishing.immigrationasylumandrefugees |archive-date=9 October 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Treatment of Asylum Seekers Tenth Report of Session 2006–07|url=https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200607/jtselect/jtrights/81/81ii.pdf|publisher=Joint Committee on Human Rights|date=30 March 2007|access-date=6 June 2017|archive-date=15 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815160626/https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200607/jtselect/jtrights/81/81ii.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>