Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Product placement
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Effectiveness=== As with most marketing tactics, product placement leads to explicit as well as implicit advertising effects. Explicit effects can be observed directly and are usually visible by higher recall scores.<ref name="Herrmann et al. 2011">{{cite journal|last1=Herrmann|first1=Jean-Lux|last2=Walliser|first2=BjΓΆrn|last3=Kacha|first3=Mathieu|title=Consumer Consideration of Sponsor Brands They Do Not Remember: Taking a Wider Look at the Memorisation Effects of Sponsorship|journal=International Journal of Advertising|date=2011|volume=30|issue=2|pages=259β281|doi=10.2501/IJA-30-2-259-281|s2cid=166766792}}</ref><ref name="Matthes et al. 2007">{{cite journal|last1=Matthes|first1=JΓΆrg|last2=Schemer|first2=Christian|last3=Wirth|first3=Werner|title=More than Meets the Eye: Investigating the Hidden Impact of Brand Placements in Television Magazines|journal=International Journal of Advertising|date=2007|volume=26|issue=4|pages=477β503|doi=10.1080/02650487.2007.11073029|s2cid=166657805}}</ref> They are highly connected to the [[conscious]] mind.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Gray|first1=Peter|title=Psychology|year=1991|publisher=W.H. Freeman & Company|isbn=978-1572599437|page=682}}</ref> Implicit effects can be observed by a change in behavior β like a higher purchase intention.<ref name="Herrmann et al. 2011" /><ref name="Johnson und Lehmann 1997">{{cite journal|last1=Johnson|first1=Michael D.|last2=Lehmann|first2=Donald R.|title=Consumer Experience and Consideration Sets For Brands and Product Categories|journal=Advances in Consumer Research|year=1997|volume=24|pages=295β300}}</ref><ref name="Shapiro et al. 1997">{{cite journal|last1=Shapiro|first1=Stewart|last2=MacInnis|first2=Deborah J.|last3=Heckler|first3=Susan E.|title=The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=1997|volume=24|issue=1|pages=94β104|doi=10.1086/209496}}</ref> They are fully based on the [[subconscious]] mind.<ref name="Herrmann et al. 2011" /><ref name="Coates et al. 2004">{{cite journal|last1=Coates|first1=Sarah L.|last2=Butler|first2=Laurie T.|last3=Berry|first3=Dianne C.|title=Implicit Memory: A Prime Example for Brand Consideration and Choice|journal=Applied Cognitive Psychology|date=2004|volume=18|issue=4|pages=1195β1211|doi=10.1002/acp.1044}}</ref> Implicit effects are more relevant for purchase decisions and therefore more valuable than explicit reactions.<ref name="Herrmann et al. 2011" /><ref name="Coates et al. 2004" /> According to a 2009 study of product placement in movies from 2002, product placement in movies are effective financially. The study observed the relationship of a company having a product placed in a movie and that company's stock price. After accounting for other variables, the study found that companies on average have their stock price increase by 0.89% due to product placement during the movie's opening.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Wiles|first1=Michael A.|last2=Danielova|first2=Anna|date=July 2009|title=The Worth of Product Placement in Successful Films: An Event Study Analysis|journal=Journal of Marketing|volume=73|issue=4|pages=44β63|doi=10.1509/jmkg.73.4.044|s2cid=220593158}}</ref> ====Recall==== Recall describes whether people can name a product after seeing it within the content. Research showed that there is a significant relationship between product placement and recall.<ref name="Bressoud 374">{{cite journal|last=Bressoud|first=Etienne|author2=Lehu, Jean-Marc |author3=Russell, Cristel Antonia |title=The Product Well Placed: The Relative Impact of Placement and Audience Characteristics on Placement Recall|journal=Journal of Advertising Research|volume=50|issue=4|page=374|doi=10.2501/S0021849910091622|year=2010|s2cid=167967314}}</ref><ref name="Delattre and Colovic 2009">{{cite journal|last=Delattre|first=Eric|author2=Colovic, Ana |title=Memory and perception of brand mentions and placement of brands in songs|journal=International Journal of Advertising|date=2009|volume=28|issue=5|pages=807β842|doi=10.2501/S0265048709200916|s2cid=152023995}}</ref><ref name="Wilson 373">{{cite journal|last=Wilson|first=Rick T.|author2=Till, Brian D. |title=Product placements in movies and on Broadway: a field study|journal=International Journal of Advertising|volume=30|issue=3|page=373|doi=10.2501/IJA-30-3-373-398|year=2011|s2cid=168632301}}</ref><ref name="Yoo 439β446">{{cite journal|last=Yoo|first=Seung-Chul|author2=PeΓ±a, Jorge|title=Do Violent Video Games Impair The Effectiveness of In-Game Advertisements? The Impact of Gaming Environment on Brand Recall, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention|journal=Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking|volume=14|issue=7β8|pages=439β446|doi=10.1089/cyber.2010.0031|pmid=21117975|year=2011|hdl=2152/41153|s2cid=206157138 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> ====Attitude==== Product placement also leads to changes in attitude towards the product or brand.<ref name="Cowley and Barron 2008">{{cite journal|last1=Cowley|first1=Elizabeth|last2=Barron|first2=Chris|title=When Product Placement Goes Wrong: The Effects of Program Liking and Placement Prominence|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=2008|volume=37|issue=1|pages=89β98|doi=10.2753/joa0091-3367370107|s2cid=144295102}}</ref><ref name="Janiszewski and Meyvis 2001">{{cite journal|last1=Janiszewski|first1=Chris|last2=Meyvis|first2=Tom|title=Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|date=2001|volume=28|issue=1|pages=18β32|doi=10.1086/321945|citeseerx=10.1.1.115.8062}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Krishnan|first1=H. Shanker|last2=Shapiro|first2=Stewart|title=Comparing Implicit and Explicit Memory for Brand Names From Advertisements|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied|year=1996|volume=2|issue=2|pages=147β163|doi=10.1037/1076-898x.2.2.147}}</ref><ref name="Lee and Faber 2007">{{cite journal|last1=Lee|first1=Mira|last2=Faber|first2=Ronald J.|title=Effects of Product Placement in On-Line Games on Brand Memory|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=2007|volume=36|issue=4|pages=75β90|doi=10.2753/joa0091-3367360406|s2cid=143613767}}</ref> ====Purchase intention==== A lot of research has shown a higher purchase intention as a result of product placement.<ref name="Auty 697β713">{{cite journal|last=Auty|first=Susan|author2=Lewis, Charlie |title=Exploring children's choice: The reminder effect of product placement|journal=Psychology and Marketing|date=2004|volume=21|issue=9|pages=697β713|doi=10.1002/mar.20025}}</ref><ref name="Law and Braun 2000">{{cite journal|last=Law|first=Sharmistha|author2=Braun, Kathryn A. |title=I'll have what she's having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers|date=2000|journal=Psychology and Marketing|volume=17|issue=12|pages=1059β1075|doi=10.1002/1520-6793(200012)17:12<1059::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-V|hdl=1813/71532|s2cid=37267120 |url=https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/322|hdl-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Mallinckrodt and Mizerski 2007">{{cite journal|last1=Mallinckrodt|first1=Victoria|last2=Mizerski|first2=Dick|title=The Effects of Playing an Advergame on Young Children's Perceptions, Preferences, and Requests|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=2007|volume=36|issue=2|pages=87β100|doi=10.2753/joa0091-3367360206|s2cid=144112785}}</ref><ref name="Morton and Friedman 2002">{{cite journal|last1=Morton|first1=Cynthia R.|last2=Friedman|first2=Meredith|title='I Saw It in the Movies': Exploring the Link Between Product Placement Beliefs and Reported Usage Behavior|journal=Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising |date=2002|volume=24|issue=2|pages=33β40|doi=10.1080/10641734.2002.10505133|s2cid=143505201}}</ref><ref name="Yang and RoskosβEwoldsen 2007">{{cite journal|last=Yang|first=Moonhee|author2=Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R. |title=The Effectiveness of Brand Placements in the Movies: Levels of Placements, Explicit and Implicit Memory, and Brand-Choice Behavior|journal=Journal of Communication|date=2007|volume=57|issue=3|pages=469β489|doi=10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00353.x}}</ref> ====Subconscious effects==== Product placement affects the audience on a conscious, but also subconscious level. Science showed that there does not even need to be an explicit, conscious effect to activate subconscious effects.<ref name="Law and Braun 2000" /><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Butler|first1=Laurie T.|last2=Berry|first2=Dianne C.|title=The Influence of Affective Statements on Performance on Implicit and Explicit Memory Tasks|journal=Applied Cognitive Psychology|date=2002|volume=16|issue=7|pages=829β843|doi=10.1002/acp.841}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Perfect|first1=T. J.|last2=Askew|first2=C.|title=Print Adverts: Not Remembered but Memorable|journal=Applied Cognitive Psychology|date=1994|volume=8|issue=7|pages=693β703|doi=10.1002/acp.2350080707}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Shapiro|first1=Stewart|last2=Krishnan|first2=H. Shanker|title=Memory-Based Measures for Assessing Advertising Effects: A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Memory Effects|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=2001|volume=30|issue=3|pages=1β13|doi=10.1080/00913367.2001.10673641|s2cid=144010274}}</ref> For example, product placement can lead to an exclusion of competing brands from the [[consideration set]] of the audience β subconsciously.<ref name="Herrmann et al. 2011" /><ref>{{cite web|last1=Kuerschner|first1=Jens|title=Subliminal Product Placement in movies (study)|url=https://www.placedise.com/blog/subliminal-product-placement-in-movies-study/|website=Placedise|publisher=Placedise GmbH|access-date=11 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151230073606/https://www.placedise.com/blog/subliminal-product-placement-in-movies-study/|archive-date=December 30, 2015|url-status=live|df=mdy-all|date=October 2014}}</ref> It is also hoped to bypass advertising defense reactions of consumers by focusing on the subconscious character of product placement.<ref name="Matthes et al. 2007" /> ====Negative effects==== Under specific circumstances, product placement can lead to no<ref name="Babin and Carder 1996">{{cite journal|last1=Babin|first1=Laurie A.|last2=Carder|first2=Sheri T.|title=Advertising via the Box Office: Is Product Placement Effective?|journal=Journal of Promotion Management|date=1996|volume=3|issue=1/2|pages=31β52|doi=10.1300/j057v03n01_03}}</ref><ref name="Russel 2002">{{cite journal|last1=Russel|first1=Cristel A.|title=Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|date=2002|volume=29|issue=3|pages=306β318|doi=10.1086/344432|url=https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Investigating_the_effectiveness_of_product_placements_in_television_shows_The_role_of_modality_and_plot_connection_congruence_on_brand_memory_and_attitude/23846562 }}</ref><ref name="Vollmer and Mizerski 1994">{{cite book|last1=Vollmer|first1=Stacy M.|last2=Mizerski|first2=Richard W.|title="A Review and Investigation into the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Films," in The Proceedings of the 1994 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, ed. Karen W. King|date=1994|publisher=Henry W. Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communications|location=Athens, GA|pages=97β102}}</ref> or even negative effects.<ref name="Cowley and Barron 2008" /><ref name="Russel 2002" /><ref name="Hackley et al. 2008">{{cite journal|last1=Hackley|first1=Christopher|last2=Tiwsakul|first2=Rungpaka A.|last3=Preuss|first3=Lutz|title=An Ethical Evaluation of Product Placement: A Deceptive Practice?|journal=Business Ethics: A European Review|date=2008|volume=17|issue=2|pages=109β120|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00525.x|s2cid=154306744|url=https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/8f0f8631-0952-8268-39e3-f831d29e2152/1/}}</ref><ref name="van Reijmersdal et al. 2009">{{cite journal|last1=van Reijmersdal|first1=Eva A.|last2=Neijens|first2=Peter C.|last3=Smit|first3=Edith G.|title=A New Branch of Advertising: Reviewing Factors That Influence Reactions to Product Placement|journal=Journal of Advertising Research|date=2009|volume=49|issue=4|pages=429β440|doi=10.2501/s0021849909091065|s2cid=82108473}}</ref> This usually happens if the product placement is too obvious, while the audience also feels it is being manipulated.<ref name="Matthes et al. 2007" /><ref name="Russel 2002" /><ref name="van Reijmersdal et al. 2009" /> ====Placement moderators==== =====Congruence===== The better the product placement fits the surrounding content, the better the implicit effectiveness (like attitude or purchase-intention) will be.<ref name="Lee and Faber 2007" /><ref>{{cite journal|last1=D'Astous|first1=Alain|last2=Bitz|first2=Pierre|title=Consumer Evaluations of Sponsorship Programmes|journal=European Journal of Marketing|date=1995|volume=29|issue=12|pages=6β22|doi=10.1108/03090569510102504}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=McDonald|first1=Colin|title=Sponsorship and the Image of the Sponsor|journal=European Journal of Marketing|date=1991|volume=25|issue=11|pages=31β38|doi=10.1108/eum0000000000630}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Parker|first1=Ken|title=Sponsorship: The Research Contribution|journal=European Journal of Marketing|date=1991|volume=25|issue=11|pages=22β30|doi=10.1108/eum0000000000629}}</ref> =====Audio vs visual===== After viewing a ''[[Seinfeld]]'' episode with visual, auditory and audiovisual product placements, a recall task indicated that audiovisual product placements were recalled the best, visual product placements somewhat less and audio placements least. In a recognition test audiovisual was still remembered the best but audio placements were remembered second best and visual placements were remembered third best.<ref name="Law and Braun 2000" /> As indicated, the type of placement that is most effective seems to vary depending on task, but audiovisual placements seem to be often the most effective.<ref name="Gupta and Lord 1998">{{cite journal|last1=Gupta|first1=Pola B.|last2=Lord|first2=Kenneth R.|title=Product Placement in Movies: The Effect of Prominence and Mode on Audience Recall|journal=Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising|date=1998|volume=20|issue=1|pages=47β59|doi=10.1080/10641734.1998.10505076}}</ref> However, audiovisual product placements are not remembered best when there is more than one audiovisual placement at once, making it hard to remember each one.<ref name="Bressoud 374" /> In case the placement is only on the audio level, advertisers must make sure it is very prominent to have any effect at all.<ref name="Delattre and Colovic 2009" /><ref name="Russel 2002" /><ref>{{cite book|last1=Purnawirawan|first1=Nathalia|last2=Wouters|first2=Marijke|last3=De Pelsmaker|first3=Patrick|title=Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. 1) |chapter=Brand Placements in Movies: The Impact of Modality, Prominence and Plot Connection on Attitude and Behavioral Intention |date=2010|volume=1|pages=347β361|doi=10.1007/978-3-8349-6006-1_23|isbn=978-3-8349-2111-6}}</ref> =====Character attractiveness===== People tended to like brand names that were paired with attractive faces more than those paired with unattractive faces. The more times a brand was paired with an attractive face, the more people liked it.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Humphreys|first=Michael S. |author2=Tangen, Jason M. |author3=Bettina Cornwell, T. |author4=Quinn, Emerald A. |author5=Murray, Krista L. |title=Unintended effects of memory on decision making: A breakdown in access control|journal=Journal of Memory and Language|volume=63|issue=3|pages=400β415|doi=10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.006|year=2010 }}</ref> =====Product prominence===== Product placement perceived to disrupt a movie, especially when repeated, were found in one study to be counterproductive. Moderate repetition of subtle product placements did not increase people's feelings of distraction.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Homer|first=Pamela Miles|title=Product Placements|journal=Journal of Advertising|volume=38|issue=3|pages=21β32|doi=10.2753/JOA0091-3367380302|year=2009|s2cid=219540666}}</ref> Products that are integrated within the plot of a movie are better recall, although not if more than one product is shown at a time.<ref name="Bressoud 374"/> In one study placements connected to the story were recognized most often, products used by the main character were remembered less often and products in the background were remembered least often.<ref name="Yang and RoskosβEwoldsen 2007" /> Placements were found more effective on a larger screen compared to on a smaller one.<ref name="Bressoud 374"/> Also, products placed in the first half of a movie tend to be remembered better than products in the second half of a movie, which demonstrates the primacy effect.<ref name="Bressoud 374"/> =====Level of Involvement===== High involvement with the program makes it easier for people to recognize the product placement.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Friestad|first1=Marian|last2=Wright|first2=Peter|title=The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|date=1994|volume=21|issue=1|pages=1β31|doi=10.1086/209380|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Moorman|first1=Marjolein|last2=Willemsen|first2=Lotte M.|last3=Neijens|first3=Peter C.|last4=Smit|first4=Edith G.|title=Program-Involvement Effects on commercial Attention and Recall of Successive and Embedded Advertising|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=2012|volume=41|issue=2|pages=25β38|doi=10.2753/JOA0091-3367410202|s2cid=143756798}}</ref> This can lead to positive effects,<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Laurent|first1=Gilles|last2=Kapferer|first2=Jean-NoΓ«l|title=Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles|journal=Journal of Marketing Research|date=1985|volume=22|issue=1|pages=41β53|doi=10.2307/3151549|jstor=3151549}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Strahan|first1=Erin J.|last2=Spencer|first2=Steven J.|last3=Zanna|first3=Mark P.|title=Subliminal Priming and Persuasion: Striking While the Iron is Hot|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|date=2002|volume=38|issue=6|pages=556β568|doi=10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4|citeseerx=10.1.1.527.6949|s2cid=21286387 }}</ref> but might also lead to negative reactions.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Zaichkowsky|first1=Judith Lynne|title=Conceptualizing Involvement|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=1986|volume=15|issue=2|pages=4β14|doi=10.1080/00913367.1986.10672999|s2cid=201047774 }}</ref> The same applies for high product category involvement.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gardner|first1=Meryl Paula|last2=Mitchell|first2=Andrew A.|last3=Russo|first3=J. Edward|title=Low Involvement Strategies for Processing Advertisements|journal=Journal of Advertising|date=1985|volume=14|issue=2|pages=4β56|doi=10.1080/00913367.1985.10672941}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)