Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
AI-complete
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Research== [[Roman Yampolskiy]]<ref>{{Citation |last=Yampolskiy |first=Roman |title=AI-Complete, AI-Hard, or AI-Easy β Classification of Problems in AI |date=2012 |work=23rd Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, MAICS 2012, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 21-22 April 2012 |url=https://www.proceedings.com/content/022/022437webtoc.pdf |access-date=2024-04-05 |language=en}}</ref> suggests that a problem <math>C</math> is '''AI-Complete''' if it has two properties: * It is in the set of AI problems (Human Oracle-solvable). * Any AI problem can be converted into <math>C</math> by some polynomial time algorithm. On the other hand, a problem <math>H</math> is '''AI-Hard''' if and only if there is an AI-Complete problem <math>C</math> that is polynomial time Turing-reducible to <math>H</math>. This also gives as a consequence the existence of '''AI-Easy''' problems, that are solvable in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine with an oracle for some problem. Yampolskiy<ref>{{Citation |last=Yampolskiy |first=Roman |title=Turing Test as a Defining Feature of AI-Completeness |date=2013 |work=Artificial Intelligence, Evolutionary Computing and Metaheuristics |series=Studies in Computational Intelligence |volume=427 |pages=3β17 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-29694-9_1|isbn=978-3-642-29693-2 }}</ref> has also hypothesized that the [[Turing Test]] is a defining feature of AI-completeness. Groppe and Jain<ref>{{Citation |last1=Groppe |first1=Sven |first2=Sarika | last2=Jain |title=The Way Forward with AI-Complete Problems |date=2024 |journal=New Generation Computing|volume=42 |pages=1β5 |language=en |doi=10.1007/s00354-024-00251-8}}</ref> classify problems which require [[artificial general intelligence]] to reach human-level machine performance as AI-complete, while only restricted versions of AI-complete problems can be solved by the current AI systems. For Ε ekrst,<ref name="Sekrst2020" /> getting a polynomial solution to AI-complete problems would not necessarily be equal to solving the issue of artificial general intelligence, while emphasizing the lack of [[computational complexity]] research being the limiting factor towards achieving artificial general intelligence. For Kwee-Bintoro and Velez,<ref>{{Citation |last1=Kwee-Bintoro |first1=Ted | last2 = Velez | first2 = Noah |title=AI-Complete: What it Means to Be Human in an Increasingly Computerized World |date=2022 |work=Bridging Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence |series=Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations |pages=257β274 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-84729-6_18|isbn=978-3-030-84728-9 }}</ref> solving AI-complete problems would have strong repercussions on society.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)