Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cauchy–Euler equation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Second order - solution using differential operators=== Observe that we can write the second-order Cauchy-Euler equation in terms of a linear [[differential operator]] <math> L </math> as <math display="block">Ly = (x^2 D^2 + axD + bI)y = 0,</math> where <math> D = \frac{d}{dx} </math> and <math> I </math> is the identity operator. We express the above operator as a polynomial in <math> xD </math>, rather than <math> D </math>. By the product rule, <math display="block"> (x D)^2 = x D(x D) = x(D + x D^2) = x^2D^2 + x D.</math> So, <math display="block"> L = (xD)^2 + (a-1)(xD) + bI.</math> We can then use the quadratic formula to factor this operator into linear terms. More specifically, let <math> \lambda_1, \lambda_2 </math> denote the (possibly equal) values of <math display="block">-\frac{a-1}{2} \pm \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(a-1)^2 - 4b}. </math> Then, <math display="block">L = (xD - \lambda_1 I)(xD - \lambda_2 I).</math> It can be seen that these factors commute, that is <math>(xD - \lambda_1 I)(xD - \lambda_2 I) = (xD - \lambda_2 I)(xD - \lambda_1 I)</math>. Hence, if <math> \lambda_1 \neq \lambda_2 </math>, the solution to <math> Ly = 0 </math> is a linear combination of the solutions to each of <math> (xD - \lambda_1 I)y = 0 </math> and <math> (xD - \lambda_2 I)y = 0 </math>, which can be solved by [[separation of variables]]. Indeed, with <math> i \in \{1,2\} </math>, we have <math> (xD - \lambda_i I)y = x\frac{dy}{dx} - \lambda_i y = 0 </math>. So, <math display="block">\begin{align} x\frac{dy}{dx} &= \lambda_i y\\ \int \frac{1}{y}\, dy &= \lambda_i \int \frac{1}{x}\, dx\\ \ln y &= \lambda_i \ln x + C\\ y &= c_i e^{\lambda_i \ln x} = c_i x^{\lambda_i}.\end{align}</math> Thus, the general solution is <math> y = c_1 x^{\lambda_1} + c_2 x^{\lambda_2} </math>. If <math> \lambda = \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 </math>, then we instead need to consider the solution of <math>(xD - \lambda I)^2y = 0 </math>. Let <math> z = (xD-\lambda I)y </math>, so that we can write <math display="block"> (xD - \lambda I)^2y = (xD - \lambda I)z = 0.</math> As before, the solution of <math> (xD- \lambda I)z = 0 </math> is of the form <math> z = c_1x^\lambda </math>. So, we are left to solve <math display="block"> (xD - \lambda I)y = x\frac{dy}{dx} - \lambda y = c_1x^\lambda.</math> We then rewrite the equation as <math display="block"> \frac{dy}{dx} - \frac{\lambda}{x} y = c_1x^{\lambda-1},</math> which one can recognize as being amenable to solution via an [[integrating factor]]. Choose <math> M(x) = x^{-\lambda} </math> as our integrating factor. Multiplying our equation through by <math> M(x) </math> and recognizing the left-hand side as the derivative of a product, we then obtain <math display="block">\begin{align} \frac{d}{dx}(x^{-\lambda} y) &= c_1x^{-1}\\ x^{-\lambda} y &= \int c_1x^{-1}\, dx\\ y &= x^\lambda (c_1\ln(x) + c_2)\\ &= c_1\ln(x)x^\lambda +c_2 x^\lambda.\end{align}</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)