Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Causative
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====One word==== {{Main|Causative alternation}} Some languages, including English, have [[ambitransitive verb]]s like ''break'', ''burn'' or ''awake'', which may either be [[intransitive verb|intransitive]] or [[Transitive verb|transitive]] ("The vase broke" vs. "I broke the vase.") These are split into two varieties: [[Ambitransitive verb#Agentive and patientive|agentive and patientive]] ambitransitives. Agentive ambitransitives (also called S=A ambitransitives) include verbs such as ''walk'' and ''knit'' because the S of the intransitive corresponds to the A of the transitive. For example: :(1a) ''Mary'' (S) ''is knitting.'' :(1b) ''Mary'' (A) ''is knitting a scarf'' (O). This type of ambitransitive does ''not'' show a causative relationship. For patientive ambitransitives (also called S=O ambitransitives), such as ''trip'' and ''spill'', the S of the intransitive corresponds to the O of the transitive: :(2a) ''The milk '' (S) ''spilled.'' :(2b) ''Jim'' (A) ''spilled the milk'' (O). These are further divided into two more types, based on speakers' intuition. Some, like ''spill'' in (2), are primarily transitive and secondarily intransitive. Other verbs like this include ''smash'' and ''extend.'' Other verbs, such as ''trip'' in (3) go the other way: they are primarily intransitive and secondarily transitive. :(3a) ''John'' (S) ''tripped.'' :(3b) ''Mary'' (A) ''tripped John'' (O). Other examples of this type include ''explode'', ''melt'', ''dissolve'', ''walk'', and ''march''. It is this type of ambitransitive verb that is considered a causative.<ref name=Dixon/>{{rp|38}} This is given some anecdotal evidence in that to translate (3b) above into languages with morphological causatives, a morpheme would need to be attached to the verb. Lexical causatives are apparently constrained to involving only one agentive argument. Semantically, the causer is usually marked as the patient. In fact, it is unlikely whether any language has a lexical causative for verbs such as ''swim'', ''sing'', ''read'', or ''kick''.<ref name=Shibatani/>{{rp|3}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)