Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== ===Box office=== ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' collected $37.6 million during its opening weekend.<ref>{{cite news |title=Charlie's Angels tops box office |url=https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2003/06/29/Charlies-Angels-tops-box-office/51631056908928/ |access-date=April 30, 2022 |work=[[United Press International]] |date=September 2, 2003 |archive-date=April 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220430194333/https://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2003/06/29/Charlies-Angels-tops-box-office/51631056908928/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The film had a production budget of $120{{nbsp}}million. It grossed $100,830,111 at the United States box office and had to depend on earnings from the international box office to make a profit. By the end of its run, the film had grossed $259,175,788 worldwide, underperforming its predecessor by $5 million.<ref name="mojo">{{cite web |title=Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=charliesangels2.htm |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |access-date=September 12, 2021 |archive-date=July 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711095854/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=charliesangels2.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> ===Critical response=== ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' received mixed reviews and earned a rating of 41% on [[Rotten Tomatoes]] based on 186 reviews, with an average rating of 5.10/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "Eye candy for those who don't require a movie to have a plot or for it to make sense".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlies_angels_full_throttle|title=Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)|access-date=March 14, 2020|website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|archive-date=December 30, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191230000348/https://rottentomatoes.com/m/charlies_angels_full_throttle|url-status=live}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]] the film has weighted average score of 48 out of 100, based on reviews from 38 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/charlies-angels-full-throttle|title=Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle|website=[[Metacritic]]|access-date=June 30, 2013|archive-date=April 2, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130402072023/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/charlies-angels-full-throttle|url-status=live}}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title= Cinemascore |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 |access-date= March 30, 2019}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film {{frac|2|1|2}} stars out of 4,<ref name="Ebert">{{cite web | date = June 27, 2003 | first = Roger | last = Ebert | author-link = Roger Ebert | title = Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle | work = [[Chicago Sun-Times]] | url = https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/charlies-angels-full-throttle-2003 | access-date = January 23, 2019 | archive-date = January 6, 2019 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190106205347/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/charlies-angels-full-throttle-2003 | url-status = live }}</ref> a higher score than the half star he gave to the first film.<ref>{{cite web | date = November 3, 2000 | title = Charlie's Angels | first = Roger | last = Ebert | author-link = Roger Ebert | work = Chicago Sun-Times | url = https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/charlies-angels-2000 | access-date = January 23, 2019 | archive-date = January 23, 2019 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190123223230/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/charlies-angels-2000 | url-status = live }}</ref> Ebert explained: "I realized I did not hate or despise the movie, and [...] I decided that I sort of liked it because of the high spirits of the women involved".<ref name="Ebert" /> Amy Dawes of ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety magazine]]'' wrote: "Bigger, sleeker and better than the first, sequel ''Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle'' is a joyride of a movie that takes the winning elements of the year 2000 hit to the next level".<ref>{{cite web |date= June 22, 2003 |last= Dawes |first= Amy |title= Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle |url= https://variety.com/2003/film/reviews/charlie-s-angels-full-throttle-1200540951/ |website= [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |access-date= August 17, 2019 |archive-date= August 17, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190817134942/https://variety.com/2003/film/reviews/charlie-s-angels-full-throttle-1200540951/ |url-status= live }}</ref> The film received seven nominations at the [[24th Golden Raspberry Awards]] including Worst Picture, Worst Actress for both [[Drew Barrymore]] and [[Cameron Diaz]], Worst Screenplay, and Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content), winning two trophies for Worst Remake or Sequel and Worst Supporting Actress for [[Demi Moore]].<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.razzies.com/asp/24thAwards.htm?cmd=view|title='GIGLI' Really Wows RAZZIE Voters|publisher=The Golden Raspberry Award Foundation|year=2004|access-date=June 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120620082407/http://www.razzies.com/asp/24thAwards.htm?cmd=view|archive-date=June 20, 2012|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The film also received seven nominations at the [[2003 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards]]: Worst Director ([[McG]]), Worst Actress (Barrymore), Worst Screenplay for a Film Grossing More Than $100 Million Worldwide Using Hollywood Math, Most Intrusive Musical Score, Worst Sequel, Least "Special" Special Effects, and Worst On-Screen Group (the Angels). It won for Worst Director and Most Intrusive Musical Score.<ref>{{cite web |title=Past Winners Database |url=http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2003/2003st.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070815123207/http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2003/2003st.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=15 August 2007 |website=The Envelope at LA Times |access-date=24 September 2019}}</ref> ===Accolades=== [[Demi Moore]] was nominated for the [[MTV Movie Award]] for [[MTV Movie Award for Best Villain|Best Villain]], but lost against co-star [[Lucy Liu]] for her role as O-Ren Ishii in [[Quentin Tarantino]]'s ''[[Kill Bill: Volume 1]]''.<ref>{{cite web |title= MTV Movie Awards 2004 |publisher= MTV |date=June 4, 2004 |url= http://www.mtv.com/ontv/movieawards/2004/ |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080423094925/http://www.mtv.com/ontv/movieawards/2004/ | archive-date= 2008-04-23 |access-date= August 16, 2019}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)