Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Class number problem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Modern developments== In 1934, [[Hans Heilbronn]] proved the Gauss conjecture.<ref name="GaussClassNumber" /> Equivalently, for any given class number, there are only finitely many imaginary quadratic number fields with that class number. Also in 1934, Heilbronn and [[Edward Linfoot]] showed that there were at most 10<ref name="HeilbronnLinfoot">{{cite journal | last=Heilbronn | first=H. | last2=Linfoot | first2=E. H. | title=ON THE IMAGINARY QUADRATIC CORPORA OF CLASS-NUMBER ONE | journal=The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics | volume=os-5 | issue=1 | date=1934 | issn=0033-5606 | doi=10.1093/qmath/os-5.1.293 | pages=293–301 | url=https://academic.oup.com/qjmath/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/qmath/os-5.1.293 | access-date=2025-04-21| url-access=subscription }}</ref> imaginary quadratic number fields with class number 1 (the 9 known ones, and at most one further). The result was ineffective (see [[effective results in number theory]]): it did not give bounds on the size of the remaining field. In later developments, the case ''n'' = 1 was first discussed by [[Kurt Heegner]], using [[modular form]]s and [[modular equation]]s to show that no further such field could exist. This work was not initially accepted; only with later work of [[Harold Stark]] and [[Bryan Birch]] (e.g. on the [[Stark–Heegner theorem]] and [[Heegner number]]) was the position clarified and Heegner's work understood. Practically simultaneously, [[Alan Baker (mathematician)|Alan Baker]] proved what we now know as [[Baker's theorem]] on [[linear forms in logarithms]] of [[algebraic number]]s, which resolved the problem by a completely different method. The case ''n'' = 2 was tackled shortly afterwards, at least in principle, as an application of Baker's work.<ref name=Baker>{{harvtxt|Baker|1990}}</ref> The complete list of imaginary quadratic fields with class number 1 is <math>\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{d})</math> where ''d'' is one of :<math>-1, -2, -3, -7, -11, -19, -43, -67, -163.</math> The general case awaited the discovery of [[Dorian Goldfeld]] in 1976 that the class number problem could be connected to the [[L-function|''L''-function]]s of [[elliptic curve]]s.<ref name=Goldfeld>{{harvtxt|Goldfeld|1985}}</ref> This effectively reduced the question of effective determination to one about establishing the existence of a multiple zero of such an ''L''-function.<ref name=Goldfeld/> With the proof of the [[Gross–Zagier theorem]] in 1986, a complete list of imaginary quadratic fields with a given class number could be specified by a finite calculation. All cases up to ''n'' = 100 were computed by Watkins in 2004.<ref name=watkins/> The class number of <math>\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-d})</math> for ''d'' = 1, 2, 3, ... is :<math>1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, 1, 6, 1, 1, 6, 4, 3, 1, ...</math> {{OEIS|A202084}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)