Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Clean climbing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Values and regulation== Most rock climbing, both long before and immediately after the development of "clean climbing", would now be classified as [[traditional climbing]] in which protection was installed and removed by each successive party on a given route. However, the term "trad climbing" only arose later, to describe that which is not [[sport climbing]], a comparatively recent activity in which all protective gear is permanently and abundantly fixed on certain routes. Fixed gear certainly existed in 1970 as it does now. Some contemporary routes, like a number of long, limestone climbs in the [[Bow Valley]], Alberta, are notable for fixed bolts at belay stances and for protection at relatively wide intervals,<ref>[http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=32276 Ascent Notes for: Northeast Face - 5.7] Retrieved 2009-09-30</ref> and thus a kind of hybrid of trad and sport is possible—if supplementary gear can be placed. Perhaps the most extreme example of acceptable non-"clean climbing" is the many [[via ferrata]] mountaineering routes, of primarily the Alps. A relatively small number of climbers believe in varying degrees that fixed gear should never be placed on any route in order to preserve the rock and its inherent challenges.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rockandice.com/inthemag.php?id=1&type=top10 |title=Rock and Ice Magazine: Top 10 Skirmishes from the North American Bolt Wars |access-date=2009-07-12 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091011150707/http://www.rockandice.com/inthemag.php?id=1&type=top10 |archive-date=2009-10-11 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rockandice.com/inthemag.php?id=245&type=onlinenews |title=Rock and Ice Magazine: Ken Nichols Chops Again? |access-date=2009-02-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090218003540/http://rockandice.com/inthemag.php?id=245&type=onlinenews |archive-date=2009-02-18 }}</ref> This long-standing cultural question of doctrine is largely separate from issues that gave rise to the term "clean climbing." Some climbing areas, notably some of the [[National Park Service|national parks]] of the United States, have ''de jure'' regulations about whether, when and how hammer activity may be employed. For example, drilling is not banned in [[Yosemite]], but power drills are. Other areas have ''de facto'' local ethics prohibiting certain activity. For example, bolting is not banned in [[Pinnacles National Park]], but the local climbing community does not tolerate rap-bolting — bottom-up route development is expected.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)