Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Complex conjugate
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Generalizations== The other planar real unital algebras, [[dual numbers]], and [[split-complex number]]s are also analyzed using complex conjugation. For matrices of complex numbers, <math display="inline">\overline{\mathbf{AB}} = \left(\overline{\mathbf{A}}\right) \left(\overline{\mathbf{B}}\right),</math> where <math display="inline">\overline{\mathbf{A}}</math> represents the element-by-element conjugation of <math>\mathbf{A}.</math><ref>Arfken, ''Mathematical Methods for Physicists'', 1985, pg. 201</ref> Contrast this to the property <math display="inline">\left(\mathbf{AB}\right)^*=\mathbf{B}^* \mathbf{A}^*,</math> where <math display="inline">\mathbf{A}^*</math> represents the [[conjugate transpose]] of <math display="inline">\mathbf{A}.</math> Taking the [[conjugate transpose]] (or adjoint) of complex [[Matrix (mathematics)|matrices]] generalizes complex conjugation. Even more general is the concept of [[adjoint operator]] for operators on (possibly infinite-dimensional) complex [[Hilbert space]]s. All this is subsumed by the *-operations of [[C*-algebra]]s. One may also define a conjugation for [[quaternion]]s and [[split-quaternion]]s: the conjugate of <math display="inline">a + bi + cj + dk</math> is <math display="inline">a - bi - cj - dk.</math> All these generalizations are multiplicative only if the factors are reversed: <math display="block">{\left(zw\right)}^* = w^* z^*.</math> Since the multiplication of planar real algebras is [[commutative]], this reversal is not needed there. There is also an abstract notion of conjugation for [[vector spaces]] <math display="inline">V</math> over the [[complex number]]s. In this context, any [[antilinear map]] <math display="inline">\varphi: V \to V</math> that satisfies # <math>\varphi^2 = \operatorname{id}_V\,,</math> where <math>\varphi^2 = \varphi \circ \varphi</math> and <math>\operatorname{id}_V</math> is the [[identity map]] on <math>V,</math> # <math>\varphi(zv) = \overline{z} \varphi(v)</math> for all <math>v \in V, z \in \Complex,</math> and # <math>\varphi\left(v_1 + v_2\right) = \varphi\left(v_1\right) + \varphi\left(v_2\right)\,</math> for all <math>v_1, v_2 \in V,</math> is called a {{em|complex conjugation}}, or a [[real structure]]. As the involution <math>\varphi</math> is [[antilinear]], it cannot be the identity map on <math>V.</math> Of course, <math display="inline">\varphi</math> is a <math display="inline">\R</math>-linear transformation of <math display="inline">V,</math> if one notes that every complex space <math>V</math> has a real form obtained by taking the same [[vector (mathematics and physics)|vector]]s as in the original space and restricting the scalars to be real. The above properties actually define a real structure on the complex vector space <math>V.</math><ref>Budinich, P. and Trautman, A. ''The Spinorial Chessboard''. Springer-Verlag, 1988, p. 29</ref> One example of this notion is the conjugate transpose operation of complex matrices defined above. However, on generic complex vector spaces, there is no {{em|[[Canonical form|canonical]]}} notion of complex conjugation.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)