Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Construction grammar
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Syntax–lexicon continuum === Unlike the componential model, construction grammar denies any strict distinction between the two and proposes a ''syntax–lexicon continuum''.<ref name="Dufter2017">Dufter, Andreas, and Stark, Elisabeth (eds., 2017) ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=_VBKDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT29 Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax]'', Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG</ref> The argument goes that words and complex constructions are both pairs of form and meaning and differ only in internal symbolic complexity. Instead of being discrete modules and thus subject to very different processes they form the extremes of a continuum (from regular to idiosyncratic): syntax > [[Subcategorization|subcategorization frame]] > idiom > [[morphology (linguistics)|morphology]] > [[syntactic category]] > word/[[lexicon]] (these are the traditional terms; construction grammars use a different terminology).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)