Editing Counterexample (section)

==In philosophy==
{{norefs|section|date=January 2025}}
In [[philosophy]], counterexamples are usually used to argue that a certain philosophical position is wrong by showing that it does not apply in certain cases. Alternatively, the first philosopher can modify their claim so that the counterexample no longer applies; this is analogous to when a mathematician modifies a conjecture because of a counterexample.

For example, in [[Plato]]'s ''[[Gorgias (dialogue)|Gorgias]]'', [[Callicles]], trying to define what it means to say that some people are "better" than others, claims that those who are stronger are better. [[Socrates]] replies that, because of their strength of numbers, the class of common rabble is stronger than the propertied class of nobles, even though the masses are ''[[prima facie]]'' of worse character. Thus Socrates has proposed a counterexample to Callicles' claim, by looking in an area that Callicles perhaps did not expect — groups of people rather than individual persons.

Callicles might challenge Socrates' counterexample, arguing perhaps that the common rabble really are better than the nobles, or that even in their large numbers, they still are not stronger. But if Callicles accepts the counterexample, then he must either withdraw his claim, or modify it so that the counterexample no longer applies. For example, he might modify his claim to refer only to individual persons, requiring him to think of the common people as a collection of individuals rather than as a mob. As it happens, he modifies his claim to say "wiser" instead of "stronger", arguing that no amount of numerical superiority can make people wiser.