Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Coupling (probability)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Biased coins=== Assume two biased coins, the first with probability ''p'' of turning up heads and the second with probability ''q'' > ''p'' of turning up heads. Intuitively, if both coins are tossed the same number of times, we should expect the first coin turns up fewer heads than the second one. More specifically, for any fixed ''k'', the probability that the first coin produces at least ''k'' heads should be less than the probability that the second coin produces at least ''k'' heads. However proving such a fact can be difficult with a standard counting argument.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Dubhashi |first1=Devdatt |last2=Panconesi |first2=Alessandro |title=Concentration of Measure for the Analysis of Randomized Algorithms |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=June 15, 2009|edition=1st |isbn=978-0-521-88427-3| page=91}}</ref> Coupling easily circumvents this problem. Let ''X''<sub>1</sub>, ''X''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''n''</sub> be [[indicator random variable|indicator variables]] for heads in a sequence of flips of the first coin. For the second coin, define a new sequence ''Y''<sub>1</sub>, ''Y''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''Y''<sub>''n''</sub> such that * if ''X<sub>i</sub>'' = 1, then ''Y<sub>i</sub>'' = 1, * if ''X<sub>i</sub>'' = 0, then ''Y<sub>i</sub>'' = 1 with probability (''q'' β ''p'')/(1 β ''p''). Then the sequence of ''Y<sub>i</sub>'' has exactly the [[probability distribution]] of tosses made with the second coin. However, because ''Y<sub>i</sub>'' depends on ''X<sub>i</sub>'', a toss by toss comparison of the two coins is now possible. That is, for any ''k'' β€ ''n'' :<math> \Pr(X_1 + \cdots + X_n > k) \leq \Pr(Y_1 + \cdots + Y_n > k).</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)