Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Crest (toothpaste)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Crest Pro-Health mouthwash side effects== ===Tooth staining=== Crest Pro-Health mouthwash contains [[cetylpyridinium chloride]] which is known to cause [[Tooth discoloration|tooth staining]] in approximately 3 percent of users.<ref>{{cite news |first= Lisa Biank |last=Fasig |date=2007-04-09 |publisher=[[Cincinnati Business Courier]] |url=http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2007/04/09/story3.html?market=cincinnati&year=2007&month=04&day=09&slug=story3.html&module=default&controller=stories&action=render |title=P&G hopes rinse effect won't wash away sales |quote=The company's Crest Pro-Health Rinse, launched with much promise in April 2005, is discoloring the teeth of about 3 percent of its users, the company said because it is doing its job.}}</ref> Crest has noted that this staining is actually an indication that the product is working as intended, as the stains are a result of bacteria dying on the teeth.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=Crest |access-date=2016-06-06 |title=Does Crest Pro-Health Rinse stain teeth brown? |url=http://news.crest.com/faq-item/health-rinse/does-crest-pro-health-rinse-stain-teeth-brown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306020259/http://news.crest.com/faq-item/health-rinse/does-crest-pro-health-rinse-stain-teeth-brown |archive-date=2016-03-06 |quote=Tooth discoloration could actually be one indication, in some people, that the product is working: after the rinse kills germs in your mouth, the dead germs can collect on the tooth surface and create the appearance of a brown stain.}}</ref> Crest stated that because of the low incidence of staining, there was no need to label Pro-Health mouthwash as a potential tooth stainer.<ref>{{cite news|last=Sewell |first=Dan |date=2008-05-07 |title=P&G's Pro-Health rinse draws complaints |url=http://abc11.com/archive/6129499/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160630111606/http://abc11.com/archive/6129499/ |archive-date=June 30, 2016 |publisher=WTVD-TV |agency=Associated Press |quote=Brinker said P&G doesn't see a need for a warning label because the number of those affected is very small. |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref> However, after numerous complaints<ref>{{cite news |title=Crest rinse fights off customer complaints |newspaper=[[USA Today]] |date=2008-05-07 |url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-05-07-crest-rinse_N.htm |quote=But NBC's Today show reported Wednesday that the complaints have led to a consumer lawsuit alleging fraud and to further study by the Food and Drug Administration, which approved the product.}}</ref> and a federal class-action lawsuit,<ref>{{cite news|last=White |first=Ed |date=2009-08-06 |title=Mich. lawyer sues, claims mouthwash stained teeth |work=San Diego Union-Tribute |agency=Associated Press |url=http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2009/aug/06/mi-mouthwash-brown-teeth-080609/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160806061433/http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2009/aug/06/mi-mouthwash-brown-teeth-080609/ |archive-date=August 6, 2016 |quote=Rossman's lawsuit seeks class-action status. It accuses P&G of violating the Michigan Consumer Protection Act by not putting a warning on the label. |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref> which was later dismissed,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.drbicuspid.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=305224 |title=Mouthwash staining lawsuit dismissed |date=2010-07-26 |publisher=DrBicuspid.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160623153103/http://www.drbicuspid.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=305224 |archive-date=June 23, 2016 |quote=A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit filed against Procter and Gamble charging that the company's Crest Pro-Health mouthwash causes staining and browning of teeth |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> the mouthwash now contains a label warning consumers of its potential to stain teeth.<ref>{{cite news|first1=Darcy |last1=Wintonyk |first2=Lynda |last2=Steele |publisher=[[CTV Television Network|CTV British Columbia]] |date=2012-10-12 |title=Consumers spitting mad after mouthwash turns teeth brown |url=http://bc.ctvnews.ca/consumers-spitting-mad-after-mouthwash-turns-teeth-brown-1.993571 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160606105706/http://bc.ctvnews.ca/consumers-spitting-mad-after-mouthwash-turns-teeth-brown-1.993571 |archive-date=June 6, 2016 |quote=The product does have a small print warning on the back label that reads: 'In some cases, antimicrobial rinses may cause surface staining to teeth,' but consumers have complained the warning label is buried in the product information. |url-status=dead |df=mdy }}</ref> ===Reducing premature birth=== The use of Crest Pro-Health mouthwash during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with a decrease in [[preterm birth]]s, presumably because the mouthwash reduces the severity of periodontal disease, which is directly linked to preterm births.<ref>{{cite news |title=Mouthwashing moms less likely to have a preemie |last=Grens |first=Kerry |date=2011-07-28 |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mouthwashing-moms-less-likely-have-pr-idUSTRE76R62620110728 |quote=Pregnant women with gum disease, also called periodontal disease, are known to have more preemies than women with healthy gums.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jeffcoat |first1=Marjorie |last2=Parry |first2=Samuel |last3=Gerlach |first3=Robert W. |last4=Doyle |first4=Matthew J. |title=Use of alcohol-free antimicrobial mouth rinse is associated with decreased incidence of preterm birth in a high-risk population |date=October 2011 |journal=[[American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology]] |volume=205 |issue=4 |pages=382.e1β382.e6 |doi=10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.016 |pmid=22083060 |url=http://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378%2811%2900917-3/abstract|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)