Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cubic graph
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Hamiltonicity== There has been much research on [[Hamiltonian cycle|Hamiltonicity]] of cubic graphs. In 1880, [[Peter Guthrie Tait|P.G. Tait]] conjectured that every cubic [[polyhedral graph]] has a [[Hamiltonian circuit]]. [[William Thomas Tutte]] provided a counter-example to [[Tait's conjecture]], the 46-vertex [[Tutte graph]], in 1946. In 1971, Tutte conjectured that all bicubic graphs are Hamiltonian. However, Joseph Horton provided a counterexample on 96 vertices, the [[Horton graph]].<ref name="Ref_a">Bondy, J. A. and Murty, U. S. R. Graph Theory with Applications. New York: North Holland, p. 240, 1976.</ref> Later, [[Mark Ellingham]] constructed two more counterexamples: the [[Ellingham–Horton graph]]s.<ref name="Ref_b">Ellingham, M. N. "Non-Hamiltonian 3-Connected Cubic Partite Graphs."Research Report No. 28, Dept. of Math., Univ. Melbourne, Melbourne, 1981.</ref><ref name="Ref_c">{{Citation|last1=Ellingham|first1=M. N.|last2=Horton|first2=J. D.|title= Non-Hamiltonian 3-connected cubic bipartite graphs|journal=[[Journal of Combinatorial Theory]]|series=Series B| volume=34| pages=350–353| year=1983| doi=10.1016/0095-8956(83)90046-1|issue=3|doi-access=free}}.</ref> [[Barnette's conjecture]], a still-open combination of Tait's and Tutte's conjecture, states that every bicubic polyhedral graph is Hamiltonian. When a cubic graph is Hamiltonian, [[LCF notation]] allows it to be represented concisely. If a cubic graph is chosen [[random graph|uniformly at random]] among all ''n''-vertex cubic graphs, then it is very likely to be Hamiltonian: the proportion of the ''n''-vertex cubic graphs that are Hamiltonian tends to one in the limit as ''n'' goes to infinity.<ref>{{citation | last1 = Robinson | first1 = R.W. | last2 = Wormald | first2 = N.C. | doi = 10.1002/rsa.3240050209 | issue = 2 | journal = Random Structures and Algorithms | pages = 363–374 | title = Almost all regular graphs are Hamiltonian | volume = 5 | year = 1994}}.</ref> [[David Eppstein]] conjectured that every ''n''-vertex cubic graph has at most 2<sup>''n''/3</sup> (approximately 1.260<sup>''n''</sup>) distinct Hamiltonian cycles, and provided examples of cubic graphs with that many cycles.<ref>{{citation | last = Eppstein | first = David | author-link = David Eppstein | arxiv = cs.DS/0302030 | issue = 1 | journal = [[Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications]] | pages = 61–81 | title = The traveling salesman problem for cubic graphs | url = http://jgaa.info/accepted/2007/Eppstein2007.11.1.pdf | volume = 11 | year = 2007 | doi=10.7155/jgaa.00137}}.</ref> The best proven estimate for the number of distinct Hamiltonian cycles is <math> O({1.276}^n)</math>.<ref>{{citation | last = Gebauer | first = H. | contribution = On the number of Hamilton cycles in bounded degree graphs | title = Proc. 4th Workshop on Analytic Algorithmics and Combinatorics (ANALCO '08) | url = https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9781611972986.8 | year = 2008 | pages = 241–248 | doi = 10.1137/1.9781611972986.8 | isbn = 9781611972986 }}.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)