Editing David Wojnarowicz (section)

====Response from Clough and Smithsonian====
Clough later said that although he stood by his decision, it "might have been made too quickly",<ref name=jacq>{{cite news|last=Trescott |first=Jacqueline |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/18/AR2011011806129.html |title=Clough defends removal of video |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=January 19, 2011 |access-date=June 27, 2012}}</ref> and called the decision "painful."<ref name=artbeat>{{cite news|last=Taylor |first=Kate |url=http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/smithsonian-chief-defends-withdrawal-of-video/ |title=Smithsonian Chief Defends Withdrawal of Video |work=The New York Times |date=January 18, 2011 |access-date=June 27, 2012}}</ref> He said that because of the controversy surrounding the footage and the possibility that it might "spiral out of control", the Smithsonian might have been forced to shut down the entire "Hide/Seek" exhibition, and that was "something he didn't want to happen."<ref name=artbeat/>

The video work was shown intact when Hide/Seek moved to the [[Tacoma Art Museum]].<ref>{{Cite news |first=Curtis |last=Cartier |url=http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/03/david_wojnarowicz_film_is_too.php |title=David Wojnarowicz Film Is Too Hot for Smithsonian and Republicans, But Not for Tacoma Art Museum |work=Seattle Weekly |date=March 17, 2011 |access-date=January 19, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110321005417/http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/03/david_wojnarowicz_film_is_too.php |archive-date=March 21, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref>