Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Descriptive complexity theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== FO without any operators === In [[circuit complexity]], first-order logic with arbitrary predicates can be shown to be equal to [[AC0|AC<sup>0</sup>]], the first class in the [[AC (complexity)|AC]] hierarchy. Indeed, there is a natural translation from FO's symbols to nodes of circuits, with <math>\forall, \exists</math> being <math>\land</math> and <math>\lor</math> of size {{mvar|n}}. First-order logic in a signature with arithmetical predicates characterises the restriction of the AC<sup>0</sup> family of circuits to those constructible in [[LH (complexity)|alternating logarithmic time]].<ref name="Immerman 1999, p. 86"/> First-order logic in a signature with only the order relation corresponds to the set of [[star-free language]]s.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Robert.|first=McNaughton|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/651199926|title=Counter-free automata|date=1971|publisher=M.I.T. Press|isbn=0-262-13076-9|oclc=651199926}}</ref><ref>Immerman 1999, p. 22</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)