Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Divisor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Further notions and facts <!-- Perfect number links here. --> == There are some elementary rules: * If <math>a \mid b</math> and <math>b \mid c,</math> then <math>a \mid c;</math> that is, divisibility is a [[transitive relation]]. * If <math>a \mid b</math> and <math>b \mid a,</math> then <math>a = b</math> or <math>a = -b.</math> (That is, <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> are [[Divisibility (ring theory)|associates]].) * If <math>a \mid b</math> and <math>a \mid c,</math> then <math> a \mid (b + c)</math> holds, as does <math> a \mid (b - c).</math>{{efn|<math>a \mid b,\, a \mid c</math> <math>\Rightarrow \exists j\colon ja=b,\, \exists k\colon ka=c</math> <math>\Rightarrow \exists j,k\colon (j+k)a=b+c</math> <math>\Rightarrow a \mid (b+c).</math> Similarly, <math>a \mid b,\, a \mid c</math> <math>\Rightarrow \exists j\colon ja=b,\, \exists k\colon ka=c</math> <math>\Rightarrow \exists j,k\colon (j-k)a=b-c</math> <math>\Rightarrow a \mid (b-c).</math>}} However, if <math>a \mid b</math> and <math>c \mid b,</math> then <math>(a + c) \mid b</math> does ''not'' always hold (for example, <math>2\mid6</math> and <math>3 \mid 6</math> but 5 does not divide 6). * <math>a \mid b \iff ac \mid bc</math> for nonzero <math>c </math>. This follows immediately from writing <math>ka = b \iff kac = bc </math>. If <math>a \mid bc,</math> and <math>\gcd(a, b) = 1,</math> then <math>a \mid c.</math>{{efn|<math>\gcd</math> refers to the [[greatest common divisor]].}} This is called [[Euclid's lemma]]. If <math>p</math> is a prime number and <math>p \mid ab</math> then <math>p \mid a</math> or <math>p \mid b.</math> A positive divisor of <math>n</math> that is different from <math>n</math> is called a '''{{vanchor|proper divisor}}''' or an '''{{vanchor|aliquot part}}''' of <math>n</math> (for example, the proper divisors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3). A number that does not evenly divide <math>n</math> but leaves a remainder is sometimes called an '''{{vanchor|aliquant part}}''' of <math>n.</math> An integer <math>n > 1</math> whose only proper divisor is 1 is called a [[prime number]]. Equivalently, a prime number is a positive integer that has exactly two positive factors: 1 and itself. Any positive divisor of <math>n</math> is a product of [[prime factor|prime divisors]] of <math>n</math> raised to some power. This is a consequence of the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]]. A number <math>n</math> is said to be [[perfect number|perfect]] if it equals the sum of its proper divisors, [[deficient number|deficient]] if the sum of its proper divisors is less than <math>n,</math> and [[abundant number|abundant]] if this sum exceeds <math>n.</math> The total number of positive divisors of <math>n</math> is a [[multiplicative function]] <math>d(n),</math> meaning that when two numbers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> are [[relatively prime]], then <math>d(mn)=d(m)\times d(n).</math> For instance, <math>d(42) = 8 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 = d(2) \times d(3) \times d(7)</math>; the eight divisors of 42 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21 and 42. However, the number of positive divisors is not a totally multiplicative function: if the two numbers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math> share a common divisor, then it might not be true that <math>d(mn)=d(m)\times d(n).</math> The sum of the positive divisors of <math>n</math> is another multiplicative function <math>\sigma (n)</math> (for example, <math>\sigma (42) = 96 = 3 \times 4 \times 8 = \sigma (2) \times \sigma (3) \times \sigma (7) = 1+2+3+6+7+14+21+42</math>). Both of these functions are examples of [[divisor function]]s. {{anchor|number_of_divisors_formula}}If the [[prime factorization]] of <math>n</math> is given by : <math> n = p_1^{\nu_1} \, p_2^{\nu_2} \cdots p_k^{\nu_k} </math> then the number of positive divisors of <math>n</math> is : <math> d(n) = (\nu_1 + 1) (\nu_2 + 1) \cdots (\nu_k + 1), </math> and each of the divisors has the form : <math> p_1^{\mu_1} \, p_2^{\mu_2} \cdots p_k^{\mu_k} </math> where <math> 0 \le \mu_i \le \nu_i </math> for each <math>1 \le i \le k.</math> For every natural <math>n,</math> <math>d(n) < 2 \sqrt{n}.</math> Also,{{sfn|ps=|Hardy|Wright|1960|p=264|loc=Theorem 320}} : <math>d(1)+d(2)+ \cdots +d(n) = n \ln n + (2 \gamma -1) n + O(\sqrt{n}),</math> where <math> \gamma </math> is [[Euler–Mascheroni constant]]. One interpretation of this result is that a randomly chosen positive integer ''n'' has an average number of divisors of about <math>\ln n.</math> However, this is a result from the contributions of [[highly composite number|numbers with "abnormally many" divisors]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)