Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Einstein field equations
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Cosmological constant == {{Main|Cosmological constant}} In the Einstein field equations <math display="block">G_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu} = \kappa T_{\mu \nu} \,,</math> the term containing the cosmological constant {{math|Λ}} was absent from the version in which he originally published them. Einstein then included the term with the cosmological constant to allow for a [[static universe|universe that is not expanding or contracting]]. This effort was unsuccessful because: * any desired steady state solution described by this equation is unstable, and * observations by [[Edwin Hubble]] showed that our universe is [[expanding universe|expanding]]. Einstein then abandoned {{math|Λ}}, remarking to [[George Gamow]] "that the introduction of the cosmological term was the biggest blunder of his life".<ref name = gamow>{{cite book| last = Gamow| first = George| author-link = George Gamow| title = My World Line : An Informal Autobiography| publisher = [[Viking Adult]]| date = April 28, 1970| isbn = 0-670-50376-2| url = http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~jpl/cosmo/blunder.html| access-date = 2007-03-14 }}</ref> The inclusion of this term does not create inconsistencies. For many years the cosmological constant was almost universally assumed to be zero. More recent [[astronomy|astronomical]] observations have shown an [[accelerating expansion of the universe]], and to explain this a positive value of {{math|Λ}} is needed.<ref name=wahl>{{cite news |last=Wahl |first=Nicolle |date=2005-11-22 |title=Was Einstein's 'biggest blunder' a stellar success? |url=http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin6/051122-1839.asp |publisher =University of Toronto |work=News@UofT |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070307191343/http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin6/051122-1839.asp <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date=2007-03-07 }}</ref><ref name= turner> {{cite journal |last=Turner |first=Michael S. |s2cid=16669258 |date=May 2001 |title=Making Sense of the New Cosmology |journal=Int. J. Mod. Phys. A |volume=17|issue=S1 |pages=180–196 |doi=10.1142/S0217751X02013113 |arxiv=astro-ph/0202008|bibcode = 2002IJMPA..17S.180T }}</ref> The effect of the cosmological constant is negligible at the scale of a galaxy or smaller. Einstein thought of the cosmological constant as an independent parameter, but its term in the field equation can also be moved algebraically to the other side and incorporated as part of the stress–energy tensor: <math display="block">T_{\mu \nu}^\mathrm{(vac)} = - \frac{\Lambda}{\kappa} g_{\mu \nu} \,.</math> This tensor describes a [[vacuum state]] with an [[vacuum energy|energy density]] {{math|''ρ''{{sub|vac}}}} and isotropic pressure {{math|''p''{{sub|vac}}}} that are fixed constants and given by <math display="block">\rho_\mathrm{vac} = - p_\mathrm{vac} = \frac{\Lambda}{\kappa},</math> where it is assumed that {{math|Λ}} has SI unit m{{sup|−2}} and {{math|''κ''}} is defined as above. The existence of a cosmological constant is thus equivalent to the existence of a vacuum energy and a pressure of opposite sign. This has led to the terms "cosmological constant" and "vacuum energy" being used interchangeably in general relativity.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)