Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Epimenides paradox
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Emergence as a logical contradiction== The logical inconsistency of a Cretan asserting all Cretans are always liars may not have occurred to Epimenides, nor to [[Callimachus]], who both used the phrase to emphasize their point, without irony, perhaps meaning that all Cretans lie routinely, but not exclusively. In the 1st century AD, the quote is mentioned by the author of the [[Epistle to Titus]] as having been spoken truly by "one of their own prophets." {{Quotation|"One of Crete's own prophets has said it: 'Cretans are always liars, evil brutes, idle bellies'.<br>He has surely told the truth. For this reason correct them sternly, that they may be sound in faith instead of paying attention to Jewish fables and to commandments of people who turn their backs on the truth." |Epistle of Paul to Titus, 1:12β14}} [[Clement of Alexandria]], in the late 2nd century AD, fails to indicate that the concept of logical paradox is an issue: {{Quotation|In his epistle to [[Saint Titus|Titus]], [[Apostle Paul]] wants to warn Titus that Cretans don't believe in the one truth of Christianity, because "Cretans are always liars". To justify his claim, Apostle Paul cites Epimenides. |[[Stromata]] 1.14}} During the early 4th century, [[Augustine of Hippo|Saint Augustine]] restates the closely related liar paradox in ''[[Against the Academicians]]'' (III.13.29), but without mentioning Epimenides. In the [[Middle Ages]], many forms of the liar paradox were studied under the heading of [[insolubilia]], but these were not explicitly associated with Epimenides. Finally, in 1740, the second volume of [[Pierre Bayle]]'s ''[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique]]'' explicitly connects Epimenides with the paradox, though Bayle labels the paradox a "sophisme".<ref>{{cite book |title=Dictionnaire Historique et Critique |last= Bayle |first= Pierre |author-link=Pierre Bayle |edition=5th |year=1740 |volume=2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FKs-AAAAcAAJ&q=qu%27Epimenide&pg=PA414 |page=414 |access-date=1 April 2011}} ''[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique]]'' at Wikipedia.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)