Editing Exigent circumstance (section)

==See also==
* ''[[Missouri v. McNeely]]'' (2013) The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a ''per se'' exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.
* ''[[Mitchell v. Wisconsin]]'' (2019) U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that in the event a driver is unconscious and therefore can't be given a breath test as an alternative to testing blood, exigent circumstances allow for the drawing of blood without a warrant.
* [[Plain view doctrine]]
* [[Search and seizure]]
* ''[[Brigham City v. Stuart]]''
* [[Powers of the police in England and Wales#Powers of entry|Powers of the police in England and Wales]] which describes similar police powers in the UK to enter property without a warrant