Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
False memory syndrome
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Sexual abuse cases === The question of the accuracy and dependability of a [[repressed memory]] that someone has later recalled has contributed to some investigations and court cases, including cases of alleged [[sexual abuse]] or [[child sexual abuse]] (CSA).<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.religioustolerance.org/rmt_reli.htm | title = Are Recovered Memories Reliable? | publisher = Religioustolerance.org | access-date = 2010-12-12 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604000440/http://www.religioustolerance.org/rmt_reli.htm |archive-date = 2011-06-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/loftus.htm | author = Colleen Born | title = Elizabeth Loftus | publisher = Muskingum.edu | access-date = 2010-12-12 | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110108060632/http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/loftus.htm | archive-date = 2011-01-08 }}</ref>{{failed verification |reason = this is just an old copy of a uni profile page for loftus, not a suitable source for the claim|date=June 2023}}<ref>{{cite web| url = https://blogs.brown.edu/recoveredmemory/ | title = Recovered Memory Project: Case Archive, Commentary, and Scholarly Resources | publisher = Brown.edu | date = 1993-05-03 | access-date = 2010-12-12 }}</ref> The research of Elizabeth Loftus has been used to counter claims of recovered memory in court<ref name = Wilson /> and it has resulted in stricter requirements for the use of recovered memories being used in trials, as well as a greater requirement for [[corroborating evidence]]. In addition, some U.S. states no longer allow prosecution based on recovered memory testimony.{{citation needed | reason=which states?|date=June 2023}} Insurance companies have become reluctant to insure therapists against malpractice suits relating to recovered memories.<ref name = Wilson /><ref name=Neimark>Neimark, J. (1996). The diva of disclosure, memory researcher Elizabeth Loftus. Psychology Today, 29, 48β53, 80.</ref><ref name=Saletan/>{{failed verification |reason = article never mentions anything about therapists' insurance|date=June 2023}} Supporters of recovered memories argue that there is "overwhelming evidence that the mind is capable of repressing traumatic memories of child sexual abuse."<ref>{{Cite news| last = Murphy | first = W. | title = Debunking 'false memory'myths in sexual abuse cases | url = http://www.smith-lawfirm.com/Murphy_Memory_Article.html | access-date = 2008-01-10 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080107073650/http://www.smith-lawfirm.com/Murphy_Memory_Article.html |archive-date = 2008-01-07 }}</ref>{{failed verification |reason=this quotation is nowhere in the article, seems to combine bits from totally different sections|date=June 2023}} Whitfield states that the "false memory" defense is "seemingly sophisticated, but mostly contrived and often erroneous." He states that this defense has been created by "accused, convicted and self-confessed child molesters and their advocates" to try to "negate their abusive, criminal behavior."<ref>{{cite journal | last = Whitfield | first = C. |date=March 2002 | title = The "False Memory" Defense Using Disinformation and Junk Science In and Out of Court | journal = Journal of Child Sexual Abuse | volume = 9 | issue = 3/4 | pages = 53β78 | url = http://www.haworthpress.com/store/ArticleAbstract.asp?sid=2LCRMC1PM7DN8N8PNL9M1A42WE7UFG4B&ID=7048 | access-date = 2008-01-11 | doi = 10.1300/J070v09n03_04 | s2cid = 24310658 | url-access = subscription }}</ref> Brown states that when pro-false memory expert witnesses and attorneys state there is no causal connection between CSA and adult psychopathology, that CSA doesn't cause specific trauma-related problems like borderline and dissociative identity disorder, that other variables than CSA can explain the variance of adult psychopathology and that the long-term effects of CSA are non-specific and general, that this testimony is inaccurate and has the potential of misleading juries.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Brown | first = D. | year = 2001 | title = (Mis)representation of the Long-Term Effects of Childhood Sexual Abuse in the Courts | journal = Journal of Child Sexual Abuse | volume = 9 | issue = 3/4 | pages = 79β107 | url = http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ672709&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ672709 | access-date = 2008-01-28 | doi = 10.1300/J070v09n03_05 |pmid=17521992 | s2cid = 20874393 | url-access = subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)