Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Fermat number
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Heuristic arguments=== Heuristics suggest that ''F''<sub>4</sub> is the last Fermat prime. The [[prime number theorem]] implies that a random integer in a suitable interval around ''N'' is prime with probability 1{{space|hair}}/{{space|hair}}ln ''N''. If one uses the heuristic that a Fermat number is prime with the same probability as a random integer of its size, and that ''F''<sub>5</sub>, ..., ''F''<sub>32</sub> are composite, then the expected number of Fermat primes beyond ''F''<sub>4</sub> (or equivalently, beyond ''F''<sub>32</sub>) should be :<math> \sum_{n \ge 33} \frac{1}{\ln F_{n}} < \frac{1}{\ln 2} \sum_{n \ge 33} \frac{1}{\log_2(2^{2^n})} = \frac{1}{\ln 2} 2^{-32} < 3.36 \times 10^{-10}.</math> One may interpret this number as an upper bound for the probability that a Fermat prime beyond ''F''<sub>4</sub> exists. This argument is not a rigorous proof. For one thing, it assumes that Fermat numbers behave "randomly", but the factors of Fermat numbers have special properties. Boklan and [[John H. Conway|Conway]] published a more precise analysis suggesting that the probability that there is another Fermat prime is less than one in a billion.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Boklan |first1=Kent D. |last2=Conway |first2=John H. |date=2017 |title=Expect at most one billionth of a new Fermat Prime! |journal=The Mathematical Intelligencer |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=3β5 |arxiv=1605.01371 |doi=10.1007/s00283-016-9644-3|s2cid=119165671 }}</ref> Anders Bjorn and [[Hans Riesel]] estimated the number of square factors of Fermat numbers from ''F''<sub>5</sub> onward as :<math> \sum_{n \ge 5} \sum_{k \ge 1} \frac{1}{k (k 2^n + 1) \ln(k 2^n)} < \frac{\pi^2}{6 \ln 2} \sum_{n \ge 5} \frac{1}{n 2^n} \approx 0.02576; </math> in other words, there are unlikely to be any non-squarefree Fermat numbers, and in general square factors of <math>a^{2^n} + b^{2^n}</math> are very rare for large ''n''.<ref name="bjorn">{{cite journal |last1=BjΓΆrn |first1=Anders |last2=Riesel |first2=Hans |title=Factors of generalized Fermat numbers |journal=Mathematics of Computation |date=1998 |volume=67 |issue=221 |pages=441β446 |doi=10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00891-6 |url=https://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/1998-67-221/S0025-5718-98-00891-6/ |language=en |issn=0025-5718|doi-access=free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)