Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Fourier transform
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Background == === History === {{Main|Fourier analysis#History|Fourier series#History}} In 1822, Fourier claimed (see {{Slink|Joseph Fourier|The Analytic Theory of Heat}}) that any function, whether continuous or discontinuous, can be expanded into a series of sines.<ref>{{harvnb|Fourier|1822}}</ref> That important work was corrected and expanded upon by others to provide the foundation for the various forms of the Fourier transform used since. === Complex sinusoids === <div class="skin-invert-image">{{multiple image | total_width = 300 | align = right | image1 = Sine voltage.svg | image2 = Phase shift.svg | footer = The red [[sine wave|sinusoid]] can be described by peak amplitude (1), peak-to-peak (2), [[root mean square|RMS]] (3), and [[wavelength]] (4). The red and blue sinusoids have a phase difference of {{mvar|ΞΈ}}. }}</div> In general, the coefficients <math>\widehat f(\xi)</math> are complex numbers, which have two equivalent forms (see [[Euler's formula]]): <math display="block"> \widehat f(\xi) = \underbrace{A e^{i \theta}}_{\text{polar coordinate form}} = \underbrace{A \cos(\theta) + i A \sin(\theta)}_{\text{rectangular coordinate form}}.</math> The product with <math>e^{i 2 \pi \xi x}</math> ({{EquationNote|Eq.2}}) has these forms: <math display="block">\begin{aligned}\widehat f(\xi)\cdot e^{i 2 \pi \xi x} &= A e^{i \theta} \cdot e^{i 2 \pi \xi x}\\ &= \underbrace{A e^{i (2 \pi \xi x+\theta)}}_{\text{polar coordinate form}}\\ &= \underbrace{A\cos(2\pi \xi x +\theta) + i A\sin(2\pi \xi x +\theta)}_{\text{rectangular coordinate form}}.\end{aligned}</math> which conveys both [[amplitude]] and [[phase offset|phase]] of frequency <math>\xi.</math> Likewise, the intuitive interpretation of {{EquationNote|Eq.1}} is that multiplying <math>f(x)</math> by <math>e^{-i 2\pi \xi x}</math> has the effect of subtracting <math>\xi</math> from every frequency component of function <math>f(x).</math><ref group="note">A possible source of confusion is the [[#Frequency shifting|frequency-shifting property]]; i.e. the transform of function <math>f(x)e^{-i 2\pi \xi_0 x}</math> is <math>\widehat{f}(\xi+\xi_0).</math> The value of this function at <math>\xi=0</math> is <math>\widehat{f}(\xi_0),</math> meaning that a frequency <math>\xi_0</math> has been shifted to zero (also see [[Negative frequency#Simplifying the Fourier transform|Negative frequency]]).</ref> Only the component that was at frequency <math>\xi</math> can produce a non-zero value of the infinite integral, because (at least formally) all the other shifted components are oscillatory and integrate to zero. (see {{slink||Example}}) It is noteworthy how easily the product was simplified using the polar form, and how easily the rectangular form was deduced by an application of Euler's formula. === Negative frequency === {{See also|Negative frequency#Simplifying the Fourier transform|l1=Negative frequency Β§ Simplifying the Fourier transform}} Euler's formula introduces the possibility of negative <math>\xi.</math> And {{EquationNote|Eq.1}} is defined <math>\forall \xi \in \mathbb{R}.</math> Only certain complex-valued <math> f(x)</math> have transforms <math> \widehat f =0, \ \forall \ \xi < 0</math> (See [[Analytic signal]]. A simple example is <math> e^{i 2 \pi \xi_0 x}\ (\xi_0 > 0).</math>) But negative frequency is necessary to characterize all other complex-valued <math> f(x),</math> found in [[signal processing]], [[partial differential equations]], [[radar]], [[nonlinear optics]], [[quantum mechanics]], and others. For a real-valued <math> f(x),</math> {{EquationNote|Eq.1}} has the symmetry property <math>\widehat f(-\xi) = \widehat {f}^* (\xi)</math> (see {{slink||Conjugation}} below). This redundancy enables {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} to distinguish <math>f(x) = \cos(2 \pi \xi_0 x)</math> from <math>e^{i2 \pi \xi_0 x}.</math> But of course it cannot tell us the actual sign of <math>\xi_0,</math> because <math>\cos(2 \pi \xi_0 x)</math> and <math>\cos(2 \pi (-\xi_0) x)</math> are indistinguishable on just the real numbers line. === Fourier transform for periodic functions === The Fourier transform of a periodic function cannot be defined using the integral formula directly. In order for integral in {{EquationNote|Eq.1}} to be defined the function must be [[Absolutely integrable function|absolutely integrable]]. Instead it is common to use [[Fourier series]]. It is possible to extend the definition to include periodic functions by viewing them as [[Distribution (mathematics)#Tempered distributions|tempered distributions]]. This makes it possible to see a connection between the [[Fourier series]] and the Fourier transform for periodic functions that have a [[Convergence of Fourier series|convergent Fourier series]]. If <math>f(x)</math> is a [[periodic function]], with period <math>P</math>, that has a convergent Fourier series, then: <math display="block"> \widehat{f}(\xi) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n \cdot \delta \left(\xi - \tfrac{n}{P}\right), </math> where <math>c_n</math> are the Fourier series coefficients of <math>f</math>, and <math>\delta</math> is the [[Dirac delta function]]. In other words, the Fourier transform is a [[Dirac comb]] function whose ''teeth'' are multiplied by the Fourier series coefficients. === Sampling the Fourier transform === {{Broader|Poisson summation formula}} The Fourier transform of an [[Absolutely integrable function|integrable]] function <math>f</math> can be sampled at regular intervals of arbitrary length <math>\tfrac{1}{P}.</math> These samples can be deduced from one cycle of a periodic function <math>f_P</math> which has [[Fourier series]] coefficients proportional to those samples by the [[Poisson summation formula]]: <math display="block">f_P(x) \triangleq \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} f(x+nP) = \frac{1}{P}\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} \widehat f\left(\tfrac{k}{P}\right) e^{i2\pi \frac{k}{P} x}, \quad \forall k \in \mathbb{Z}</math> The integrability of <math>f</math> ensures the periodic summation converges. Therefore, the samples <math>\widehat f\left(\tfrac{k}{P}\right)</math> can be determined by Fourier series analysis: <math display="block">\widehat f\left(\tfrac{k}{P}\right) = \int_{P} f_P(x) \cdot e^{-i2\pi \frac{k}{P} x} \,dx.</math> When <math>f(x)</math> has [[compact support]], <math>f_P(x)</math> has a finite number of terms within the interval of integration. When <math>f(x)</math> does not have compact support, numerical evaluation of <math>f_P(x)</math> requires an approximation, such as tapering <math>f(x)</math> or truncating the number of terms.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)