Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gauss–Kuzmin–Wirsing operator
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Eigenvalues of the operator=== The first [[eigenfunction]] of this operator is :<math>\frac 1{\ln 2}\ \frac 1{1+x}</math> which corresponds to an [[eigenvalue]] of ''λ''<sub>1</sub> = 1. This eigenfunction gives the probability of the occurrence of a given integer in a continued fraction expansion, and is known as the [[Gauss–Kuzmin distribution]]. This follows in part because the Gauss map acts as a truncating [[shift operator]] for the [[continued fraction]]s: if : <math>x=[0;a_1,a_2,a_3,\dots]</math> is the continued fraction representation of a number 0 < ''x'' < 1, then : <math>h(x)=[0;a_2,a_3,\dots].</math> Because <math>h</math> is conjugate to a [[Bernoulli shift]], the eigenvalue <math>\lambda_1=1</math> is simple, and since the operator leaves invariant the Gauss–Kuzmin measure, the operator is [[ergodic]] with respect to the measure. This fact allows a short proof of the existence of [[Khinchin's constant]]. Additional eigenvalues can be computed numerically; the next eigenvalue is ''λ''<sub>2</sub> = −0.3036630029... {{OEIS|A038517}} and its absolute value is known as the '''Gauss–Kuzmin–Wirsing constant'''. Analytic forms for additional eigenfunctions are not known. It is not known if the eigenvalues are [[irrational]]. Let us arrange the eigenvalues of the Gauss–Kuzmin–Wirsing operator according to an absolute value: :<math>1=|\lambda_1|> |\lambda_2|\geq|\lambda_3|\geq\cdots.</math> It was conjectured in 1995 by [[Philippe Flajolet]] and [[Brigitte Vallée]] that :<math> \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\lambda_n}{\lambda_{n+1}} = -\varphi^2, \text{ where } \varphi=\frac{1+\sqrt 5} 2. </math> In 2018, Giedrius Alkauskas gave a convincing argument that this conjecture can be refined to a much stronger statement:<ref>{{cite arXiv |last1=Alkauskas |first1=Giedrius |year=2018 |title=Transfer operator for the Gauss' continued fraction map. I. Structure of the eigenvalues and trace formulas |eprint=1210.4083 |class=math.NT}}</ref> :<math> \begin{align} & (-1)^{n+1}\lambda_n=\varphi^{-2n} + C\cdot\frac{\varphi^{-2n}}{\sqrt{n}}+d(n)\cdot\frac{\varphi^{-2n}}{n}, \\[4pt] & \text{where } C=\frac{\sqrt[4]{5}\cdot\zeta(3/2)}{2\sqrt{\pi}}=1.1019785625880999_{+}; \end{align} </math> here the function <math>d(n)</math> is bounded, and <math>\zeta(\star)</math> is the [[Riemann zeta function]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)