Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Genuine progress indicator
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==In legislative decisions== The best-known{{Dubious|date=September 2021}} attempts to apply the concepts of GPI to legislative decisions are probably the ''GPI Atlantic'',<ref>{{cite web|url=http://gpiatlantic.org|title=GPI Atlantic|work=gpiatlantic.org}}</ref> an index, not an indicator, invented by Ronald Colman for [[Atlantic Canada]], who explicitly avoids aggregating the results obtained through research to a single number, alleging that it keeps decisions makers in the dark; the Alberta GPI<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ww12.fiscallygreen.ca/gpi/index.php|title=fiscallygreen.ca|website=ww12.fiscallygreen.ca|accessdate=14 April 2023}}</ref> created by ecological economist Mark Anielski to measure the long-term economic, social and [[environmental sustainability]] of the province of [[Alberta]] and the "environmental and sustainable development indicators" used by the [[Government of Canada]] to measure its own progress to achieving well-being goals. The [[Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators]] program is an effort to justify [[state services]] in GPI terms.{{Citation needed|date=September 2021}} It assigns the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, an officer in the [[Auditor-General of Canada]]'s office, to perform the analysis and report to the [[House of Commons of Canada|House of Commons]]. However, Canada continues to state its overall budgetary targets in terms of reducing its [[debt to GDP ratio]], which implies that GDP increase and debt reduction in some combination are its main priorities. In the [[European Union|European Union (EU)]] the Metropole efforts and the [[London Health Observatory]] methods are equivalents focused mostly on urban lifestyle. The EU and Canadian efforts are among the most advanced in any of the [[G8]] or [[OECD]] nations,{{Citation needed|date=September 2021}} but there are parallel efforts to measure [[quality of life]] or [[standard of living]] in [[health]] (not strictly [[wealth]]) terms in all [[developed country|developed nation]]s. This has also been a recent focus of the [[labour movement]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)